Do climate change policy instruments loom like the sword of Damocles over green technology independence to achieve green growth and sustainability in Europe?

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Nikos Chatzistamoulou , Andriana G. Dimakopoulou
{"title":"Do climate change policy instruments loom like the sword of Damocles over green technology independence to achieve green growth and sustainability in Europe?","authors":"Nikos Chatzistamoulou ,&nbsp;Andriana G. Dimakopoulou","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We introduce a conceptual framework that synthesizes the European policy framework with country-specific capabilities to examine the impact of green policy tools and non-linear effects of eco-innovation progress on green technology independence within the EU-28 during the transformative period 2010–2019. Focusing on green technology independence allows us to delve into the key contributors of technological aspects of green growth. Despite its recognized significance in sustainability transition, this aspect remains vastly unexplored. We introduce a novel measure, the climate change mitigation policy rate to assess the extent of national action in addressing climate change, alongside climate taxes and environmental policy effectiveness, for the first time. Econometric results from panel quantile regressions indicate that green technology independence is prone to green taxation and climate change mitigation policy rate, across tiers. Findings indicate that green technology independence is affected by eco-innovation in a non-linear manner, as a U-shaped relationship is substantiated. Moreover, highly effective environmental policy negatively affects countries with low level of green technology independence. Policy-wise, a flexible policy framework is more conducive to promoting green technology independence than a rigid one, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach in policy making. This study contributes to SDGs 7, 9, 12 and 13.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 124100"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525001313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce a conceptual framework that synthesizes the European policy framework with country-specific capabilities to examine the impact of green policy tools and non-linear effects of eco-innovation progress on green technology independence within the EU-28 during the transformative period 2010–2019. Focusing on green technology independence allows us to delve into the key contributors of technological aspects of green growth. Despite its recognized significance in sustainability transition, this aspect remains vastly unexplored. We introduce a novel measure, the climate change mitigation policy rate to assess the extent of national action in addressing climate change, alongside climate taxes and environmental policy effectiveness, for the first time. Econometric results from panel quantile regressions indicate that green technology independence is prone to green taxation and climate change mitigation policy rate, across tiers. Findings indicate that green technology independence is affected by eco-innovation in a non-linear manner, as a U-shaped relationship is substantiated. Moreover, highly effective environmental policy negatively affects countries with low level of green technology independence. Policy-wise, a flexible policy framework is more conducive to promoting green technology independence than a rigid one, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach in policy making. This study contributes to SDGs 7, 9, 12 and 13.

Abstract Image

气候变化政策工具是否像达摩克利斯之剑一样悬在欧洲实现绿色增长和可持续发展的绿色技术独立之上?
我们引入了一个概念性框架,该框架将欧洲政策框架与具体国家的能力相结合,以检验欧盟28国在2010-2019年转型期间绿色政策工具的影响以及生态创新进展对绿色技术独立性的非线性影响。关注绿色技术的独立性使我们能够深入研究绿色增长的技术方面的关键贡献者。尽管它在可持续转型中的重要性得到公认,但这方面仍未得到广泛探索。我们首次引入了一项新措施,即减缓气候变化政策率,以评估各国应对气候变化行动的程度,同时评估气候税和环境政策的有效性。面板分位数回归的计量经济结果表明,绿色技术独立性倾向于绿色税收和减缓气候变化政策率。结果表明,绿色技术独立性受生态创新的影响呈非线性关系,呈u型关系。此外,高效的环境政策会对绿色技术独立程度较低的国家产生负面影响。在政策方面,灵活的政策框架比僵化的政策框架更有利于促进绿色技术的独立性,强调在制定政策时需要采用整体方法。本研究有助于实现可持续发展目标7、9、12和13。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信