A pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial of an audit, feedback, and coaching intervention on compliance with elementary physical education laws and student physical activity during lesson time

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hannah R. Thompson , Caroline Nguyen , Thomas L. McKenzie , David A. Dzewaltowski , Kristine A. Madsen
{"title":"A pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial of an audit, feedback, and coaching intervention on compliance with elementary physical education laws and student physical activity during lesson time","authors":"Hannah R. Thompson ,&nbsp;Caroline Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thomas L. McKenzie ,&nbsp;David A. Dzewaltowski ,&nbsp;Kristine A. Madsen","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Compliance with elementary school physical education law is low. School district-led PE audit, feedback, and coaching (PEAFC), along with funding credentialed teachers, demonstrated the potential for improving compliance with law in New York City public schools. However, the likely scalable approach of PEAFC, alone, has not been rigorously tested in other districts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two-year pilot cluster-RCT in 10 Bay Area, California elementary schools (mean enrollment 421; 66 % Latino; 92 % free or reduced-price meal eligible). Five schools were randomized to receive PEAFC. Physical education lessons (<em>n</em> = 168) were observed using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time in Fall 2022, Spring 2023, and Spring 2024. Linear mixed effects models examined the impact of PEAFC on between-group changes in law compliance (using scheduled and estimated physical education minutes) and lesson time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no statistically significant differences in changes in scheduled or estimated minutes between times between groups. Students in both intervention (10 % increase; 95 % CI: 2.17 %, 17.41 %) and control (9 % increase; 95 % CI: 2.61 %, 14.42 %) schools increased lesson time in MVPA, but there was not a statistically significant difference in change between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>PEAFC did not impact physical education law compliance or lesson time spent in MVPA. In the absence of credentialed physical education teachers to provide mandated minutes, PEAFC may be limited in its potential to increase compliance with state mandates. Hiring credentialed physical education teachers in elementary schools may be the most effective way to support compliance with state physical education laws.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 103037"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335525000762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Compliance with elementary school physical education law is low. School district-led PE audit, feedback, and coaching (PEAFC), along with funding credentialed teachers, demonstrated the potential for improving compliance with law in New York City public schools. However, the likely scalable approach of PEAFC, alone, has not been rigorously tested in other districts.

Methods

Two-year pilot cluster-RCT in 10 Bay Area, California elementary schools (mean enrollment 421; 66 % Latino; 92 % free or reduced-price meal eligible). Five schools were randomized to receive PEAFC. Physical education lessons (n = 168) were observed using the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time in Fall 2022, Spring 2023, and Spring 2024. Linear mixed effects models examined the impact of PEAFC on between-group changes in law compliance (using scheduled and estimated physical education minutes) and lesson time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in changes in scheduled or estimated minutes between times between groups. Students in both intervention (10 % increase; 95 % CI: 2.17 %, 17.41 %) and control (9 % increase; 95 % CI: 2.61 %, 14.42 %) schools increased lesson time in MVPA, but there was not a statistically significant difference in change between groups.

Discussion

PEAFC did not impact physical education law compliance or lesson time spent in MVPA. In the absence of credentialed physical education teachers to provide mandated minutes, PEAFC may be limited in its potential to increase compliance with state mandates. Hiring credentialed physical education teachers in elementary schools may be the most effective way to support compliance with state physical education laws.
针对遵守小学体育教育法和学生课间体育活动的审核、反馈和辅导干预的分组随机对照试验
目的:小学生对体育教法的遵守程度较低。学区主导的体育审计、反馈和指导(PEAFC),以及资助有资质的教师,展示了纽约市公立学校提高守法程度的潜力。然而,和平儿童基金会可能采用的可扩展方法尚未在其他地区得到严格检验。方法在加州湾区10所小学进行为期两年的集群随机对照试验(平均在校生421人;拉丁裔占66%;92%免费或减价用餐)。五所学校被随机分配到PEAFC项目。采用健身教学时间观察系统对2022年秋季、2023年春季和2024年春季的168例体育课进行观察。线性混合效应模型检验了PEAFC对中高强度体育活动(MVPA)中遵守法律(使用计划和估计的体育时间)和上课时间的组间变化的影响。结果两组患者的计划分钟数和估计分钟数变化无统计学差异。两种干预的学生(增加10%;95% CI: 2.17%, 17.41%)和对照组(增加9%;95% CI: 2.61%, 14.42%)学校增加了MVPA的上课时间,但组间变化无统计学差异。peafc不影响体育教育法的遵守或在MVPA的课程时间。在缺乏有资格的体育教师提供规定的分钟数的情况下,PEAFC在提高对州规定的遵守方面的潜力可能受到限制。在小学雇用有资格的体育教师可能是支持遵守州体育法律的最有效方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信