Exploring failure mechanisms in reinforced concrete slab-column joints: Machine learning and causal analysis

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
A. Ӧzyüksel Çiftçioğlu
{"title":"Exploring failure mechanisms in reinforced concrete slab-column joints: Machine learning and causal analysis","authors":"A. Ӧzyüksel Çiftçioğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reinforced concrete slab-column construction comprises interconnected slabs and columns that constitute the structural system of a building. While providing architectural flexibility and ease of construction, these types of structures are prone to failure because the structural arrangement beneath the slabs is not always considered thoroughly. This research uses machine learning models to conduct an in-depth study and categorizes failure modes into three main types: flexure, punching, and combined flexure-punching modes. These failure modes are classified with appreciable accuracy by eight machine learning approaches: RAGN-L, Random Forest, Extra Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, Adaptive Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifiers, optimized using hyperparameter tuning. The results indicate that the RAGN-L achieves the highest accuracy at 0.99, followed by the Random Forest model with an accuracy of 0.98. The study extends the machine learning analysis by investigating the deep causes that rule the complex interactions among key structural parameters. SHAP analysis revealed the influence of features like slab thickness, reinforcement ratio, and punching shear strength on failure modes. Counterfactual analyses further revealed how changes in these parameters can change failure modes and indicate their sensitivity and robustness. The results imply that reducing or optimizing certain parameter values will change the sample types and thus make them change between failure modes. By combining machine learning, SHAP analysis, causal analysis, and counterfactual methods, this study offers valuable insights into the failure mechanisms of slab-column joints and provides actionable recommendations to enhance structural safety and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 109549"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630725002900","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete slab-column construction comprises interconnected slabs and columns that constitute the structural system of a building. While providing architectural flexibility and ease of construction, these types of structures are prone to failure because the structural arrangement beneath the slabs is not always considered thoroughly. This research uses machine learning models to conduct an in-depth study and categorizes failure modes into three main types: flexure, punching, and combined flexure-punching modes. These failure modes are classified with appreciable accuracy by eight machine learning approaches: RAGN-L, Random Forest, Extra Trees, K-Nearest Neighbors, Adaptive Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, and Gaussian Naive Bayes classifiers, optimized using hyperparameter tuning. The results indicate that the RAGN-L achieves the highest accuracy at 0.99, followed by the Random Forest model with an accuracy of 0.98. The study extends the machine learning analysis by investigating the deep causes that rule the complex interactions among key structural parameters. SHAP analysis revealed the influence of features like slab thickness, reinforcement ratio, and punching shear strength on failure modes. Counterfactual analyses further revealed how changes in these parameters can change failure modes and indicate their sensitivity and robustness. The results imply that reducing or optimizing certain parameter values will change the sample types and thus make them change between failure modes. By combining machine learning, SHAP analysis, causal analysis, and counterfactual methods, this study offers valuable insights into the failure mechanisms of slab-column joints and provides actionable recommendations to enhance structural safety and reliability.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信