Cash management amid HFCAA-Induced data breach risks: A comparative analysis of reactive vs. proactive responses in Chinese firms

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xin Liu , Chenlan Liu , Mingzhe Duan , Sicen Chen
{"title":"Cash management amid HFCAA-Induced data breach risks: A comparative analysis of reactive vs. proactive responses in Chinese firms","authors":"Xin Liu ,&nbsp;Chenlan Liu ,&nbsp;Mingzhe Duan ,&nbsp;Sicen Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Following the introduction of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (hereafter referred to as HFCAA), U.S.-listed Chinese stocks are faced with economic risk and the risk of data breaches. This study examines the relationship between political data breach risks and cash holdings of firms in China. In response to the risk of data breaches posed by the HFCAA, we believe that Chinese firms may have two competing defend strategies: the reactive defend strategy, which increases their cash reserves as a precautionary measure, and the proactive defend strategy, which utilizes their cash to strengthen their competitive barriers. In the baseline results, we find that when firms in China perceive the industry spillover effect of data breaches, which is from U.S.-listed Chinese firms identified by HFCAA, they will hold less cash, which is consistent with the proactive risk strategy. Our results are robust to alternative measures of cash holdings, parallel trend assumption, PSM-DID and placebo tests. Cross-sectional tests also show that firms with different levels will have various effects. In addition, our further analyses elucidate the channels through which cash holdings are influenced, finding that when faced with data breach risks, Chinese firms are likely to increase their R&amp;D expenditures, which correlates with an increase in the value of their cash holdings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 104059"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025002229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the introduction of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (hereafter referred to as HFCAA), U.S.-listed Chinese stocks are faced with economic risk and the risk of data breaches. This study examines the relationship between political data breach risks and cash holdings of firms in China. In response to the risk of data breaches posed by the HFCAA, we believe that Chinese firms may have two competing defend strategies: the reactive defend strategy, which increases their cash reserves as a precautionary measure, and the proactive defend strategy, which utilizes their cash to strengthen their competitive barriers. In the baseline results, we find that when firms in China perceive the industry spillover effect of data breaches, which is from U.S.-listed Chinese firms identified by HFCAA, they will hold less cash, which is consistent with the proactive risk strategy. Our results are robust to alternative measures of cash holdings, parallel trend assumption, PSM-DID and placebo tests. Cross-sectional tests also show that firms with different levels will have various effects. In addition, our further analyses elucidate the channels through which cash holdings are influenced, finding that when faced with data breach risks, Chinese firms are likely to increase their R&D expenditures, which correlates with an increase in the value of their cash holdings.
在《外国公司责任追究法》(以下简称 HFCAA)出台后,在美国上市的中概股面临着经济风险和数据泄露风险。本研究探讨了政治数据泄露风险与中国企业现金持有量之间的关系。我们认为,中国企业在应对 HFCAA 带来的数据泄露风险时,可能有两种相互竞争的防御策略:一种是被动防御策略,即增加现金储备作为预防措施;另一种是主动防御策略,即利用现金来加强竞争壁垒。在基线结果中,我们发现当中国企业感知到数据泄露的行业溢出效应时,即来自 HFCAA 识别出的在美国上市的中国企业的溢出效应时,它们会减少现金持有量,这与主动风险策略相一致。我们的结果对其他现金持有量、平行趋势假设、PSM-DID 和安慰剂测试都是稳健的。横截面测试也表明,不同水平的企业会产生不同的影响。此外,我们的进一步分析阐明了现金持有量的影响渠道,发现当面临数据泄露风险时,中国企业可能会增加研发支出,而这与现金持有量的增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信