Pharmacy faculty and students perceptions of artificial intelligence: A National Survey

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kyle A. Gustafson , Sarah Berman , Paul Gavaza , Islam Mohamed , Radhika Devraj , May H. Abdel Aziz , Divita Singh , Robin Southwood , Motolani E. Ogunsanya , Angela Chu , Vivek Dave , Jarred Prudencio , Faria Munir , Trager D. Hintze , Casey Rowe , Allison Bernknopf , Damianne Brand-Eubanks , Alexander Hoffman , Ellen Jones , Victoria Miller , Leanne Showman
{"title":"Pharmacy faculty and students perceptions of artificial intelligence: A National Survey","authors":"Kyle A. Gustafson ,&nbsp;Sarah Berman ,&nbsp;Paul Gavaza ,&nbsp;Islam Mohamed ,&nbsp;Radhika Devraj ,&nbsp;May H. Abdel Aziz ,&nbsp;Divita Singh ,&nbsp;Robin Southwood ,&nbsp;Motolani E. Ogunsanya ,&nbsp;Angela Chu ,&nbsp;Vivek Dave ,&nbsp;Jarred Prudencio ,&nbsp;Faria Munir ,&nbsp;Trager D. Hintze ,&nbsp;Casey Rowe ,&nbsp;Allison Bernknopf ,&nbsp;Damianne Brand-Eubanks ,&nbsp;Alexander Hoffman ,&nbsp;Ellen Jones ,&nbsp;Victoria Miller ,&nbsp;Leanne Showman","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study explores the perceptions, familiarity, and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) among pharmacy faculty and students across the United States. By identifying key gaps in AI education and training, it highlights the need for structured curricular integration to prepare future pharmacists for an evolving digital healthcare landscape.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 19-item Qualtrics™ survey was created to assess perceptions of AI use among pharmacy faculty and students and distributed utilizing publicly available contacts at schools of pharmacy and intern lists. The electronic survey was open from September 5th to November 22nd 2023. Responses were analyzed for trends and compared between faculty and student responses across four sub-domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 235 pharmacy faculty and 405 pharmacy students completed the survey. Responses indicated high familiarity with AI in both groups but found differences in training. Both groups identified ethical considerations and training as major barriers to AI integration. Faculty were less likely to trust AI responses than students despite reporting similar rates of incorrect information. Students were more concerned than faculty about AI reducing pharmacy jobs, particularly in community and health-system settings.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study highlights the need for intentional AI training tailored to pharmacy students, aiming to bridge the knowledge gap and equip them with the skills to navigate an AI-driven future. The inconsistency in how AI is addressed within the curriculum and the lack of established ethical guidelines display the need for clear and consistent institutional policies and professional guidance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 6","pages":"Article 102344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725000656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study explores the perceptions, familiarity, and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) among pharmacy faculty and students across the United States. By identifying key gaps in AI education and training, it highlights the need for structured curricular integration to prepare future pharmacists for an evolving digital healthcare landscape.

Methods

A 19-item Qualtrics™ survey was created to assess perceptions of AI use among pharmacy faculty and students and distributed utilizing publicly available contacts at schools of pharmacy and intern lists. The electronic survey was open from September 5th to November 22nd 2023. Responses were analyzed for trends and compared between faculty and student responses across four sub-domains.

Results

A total of 235 pharmacy faculty and 405 pharmacy students completed the survey. Responses indicated high familiarity with AI in both groups but found differences in training. Both groups identified ethical considerations and training as major barriers to AI integration. Faculty were less likely to trust AI responses than students despite reporting similar rates of incorrect information. Students were more concerned than faculty about AI reducing pharmacy jobs, particularly in community and health-system settings.

Discussion

This study highlights the need for intentional AI training tailored to pharmacy students, aiming to bridge the knowledge gap and equip them with the skills to navigate an AI-driven future. The inconsistency in how AI is addressed within the curriculum and the lack of established ethical guidelines display the need for clear and consistent institutional policies and professional guidance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信