Multi-process manufacturing framework: A cost-effective approach for pediatric prosthetic knee joints in above-knee amputations

Pratisthit Lal Shrestha, Sudan Baral, Isha Acharya, Bhola Thapa
{"title":"Multi-process manufacturing framework: A cost-effective approach for pediatric prosthetic knee joints in above-knee amputations","authors":"Pratisthit Lal Shrestha,&nbsp;Sudan Baral,&nbsp;Isha Acharya,&nbsp;Bhola Thapa","doi":"10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing manufacturing methods for pediatric knee joints can be expensive and resource-intensive, which makes them inaccessible to low and middle-income countries. This challenge is further complicated for toddlers aged 3–5, which is a crucial time for their rapid growth and may necessitate frequent knee joint replacements. This issue demands a framework that can suggest a suitable combination of manufacturing methods for reliable pediatric prosthetic knee joints at an affordable price. This study investigated a multi-process manufacturing approach for a typical polycentric 4-bar knee joint based on Geometric Complexity Score (GCS), Mechanical Strength Requirements (MSR), and Affordability. The GCS matrix identified Additive Manufacturing (AM) as preferable for highly complex parts and Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) for moderately and least complex parts. The MSR analysis categorized components based on stress levels, with the highest stress observed in the pin (147.27 MPa under loading condition 1 and 108.07 MPa under loading condition 2) and the lowest in the washer (4.1384 MPa and 2.71 MPa, respectively). The affordability study evaluated that the production cost index for AM, SM, and the hybrid approach was 0.186, 1, and 0.277, respectively. The results demonstrated that a multi-process manufacturing approach, utilizing AM for complex geometries and SM for simpler components, offers an optimal balance of affordability, strength, and manufacturability. This study paves the way for creating cost-effective, pediatric prosthetic knee joints, enhancing accessibility and quality of life for amputees. Further research is required to refine the design and assess long-term performance through clinical trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100614,"journal":{"name":"Hybrid Advances","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hybrid Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773207X25000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing manufacturing methods for pediatric knee joints can be expensive and resource-intensive, which makes them inaccessible to low and middle-income countries. This challenge is further complicated for toddlers aged 3–5, which is a crucial time for their rapid growth and may necessitate frequent knee joint replacements. This issue demands a framework that can suggest a suitable combination of manufacturing methods for reliable pediatric prosthetic knee joints at an affordable price. This study investigated a multi-process manufacturing approach for a typical polycentric 4-bar knee joint based on Geometric Complexity Score (GCS), Mechanical Strength Requirements (MSR), and Affordability. The GCS matrix identified Additive Manufacturing (AM) as preferable for highly complex parts and Subtractive Manufacturing (SM) for moderately and least complex parts. The MSR analysis categorized components based on stress levels, with the highest stress observed in the pin (147.27 MPa under loading condition 1 and 108.07 MPa under loading condition 2) and the lowest in the washer (4.1384 MPa and 2.71 MPa, respectively). The affordability study evaluated that the production cost index for AM, SM, and the hybrid approach was 0.186, 1, and 0.277, respectively. The results demonstrated that a multi-process manufacturing approach, utilizing AM for complex geometries and SM for simpler components, offers an optimal balance of affordability, strength, and manufacturability. This study paves the way for creating cost-effective, pediatric prosthetic knee joints, enhancing accessibility and quality of life for amputees. Further research is required to refine the design and assess long-term performance through clinical trials.
多工序制造框架:一种成本效益高的方法,用于膝上截肢的儿童假肢膝关节
小儿膝关节的现有制造方法可能既昂贵又耗费资源,因此中低收入国家无法使用。对于 3-5 岁的幼儿来说,这一挑战更加复杂,因为这是他们快速成长的关键时期,可能需要频繁更换膝关节。这个问题需要一个框架,它能建议一种合适的制造方法组合,从而以可承受的价格制造出可靠的小儿假体膝关节。本研究根据几何复杂性评分(GCS)、机械强度要求(MSR)和经济承受能力,对典型多中心 4 杆式膝关节的多工序制造方法进行了研究。几何复杂度矩阵确定增材制造(AM)适用于高度复杂的零件,而减材制造(SM)适用于中等和最不复杂的零件。MSR 分析根据应力水平对部件进行了分类,观察到最高应力出现在销轴(加载条件 1 下为 147.27 兆帕,加载条件 2 下为 108.07 兆帕),最低应力出现在垫圈(分别为 4.1384 兆帕和 2.71 兆帕)。经济性研究评估表明,AM、SM 和混合方法的生产成本指数分别为 0.186、1 和 0.277。研究结果表明,采用多工序制造方法,利用 AM 制造复杂的几何形状,利用 SM 制造较简单的部件,可在经济性、强度和可制造性之间实现最佳平衡。这项研究为制造具有成本效益的小儿假体膝关节铺平了道路,提高了截肢者的可及性和生活质量。还需要进一步的研究来完善设计,并通过临床试验评估其长期性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信