Risk across the spectrum: Unpacking the nexus of global oil uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, energy volatility, and US-China trade tensions

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Seyi Saint Akadiri , Oktay Ozkan
{"title":"Risk across the spectrum: Unpacking the nexus of global oil uncertainty, geopolitical tensions, energy volatility, and US-China trade tensions","authors":"Seyi Saint Akadiri ,&nbsp;Oktay Ozkan","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing interconnectedness of the world's political and economic institutions leaves them open to a series of hazards, including trade tensions, geopolitical conflicts, oil price fluctuations, and uncertainty in the energy market. Even though comprehending these interrelated dynamics is crucial, much research has concentrated on individual risk variables, ignoring the more extensive systemic linkages across quantiles and fluctuating market conditions. Using a novel generalized quantile-on-quantile connectedness technique, this work fills this gap by examining the interconnectivity and risk transmission dynamics among geopolitical risk, global oil price uncertainty, US-China trade tensions, and energy-related uncertainty. The study reveals quantile-specific and temporal disparities in the evolution of risk transmission across calm and crisis periods using monthly data from March 1996 to December 2023. Significant events like the Iraq War, the worldwide financial crisis, the COVID-19 epidemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war correspond with notable peaks in overall connection. The results show that oil price volatility and geopolitical risks are primary risk transmitters, mainly affecting energy-related uncertainty, which is always the biggest recipient of spillovers. These findings highlight the necessity of adaptive, quantile-specific policies to reduce systemic vulnerabilities and efficiently manage global risks in stable and tumultuous times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 114609"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing interconnectedness of the world's political and economic institutions leaves them open to a series of hazards, including trade tensions, geopolitical conflicts, oil price fluctuations, and uncertainty in the energy market. Even though comprehending these interrelated dynamics is crucial, much research has concentrated on individual risk variables, ignoring the more extensive systemic linkages across quantiles and fluctuating market conditions. Using a novel generalized quantile-on-quantile connectedness technique, this work fills this gap by examining the interconnectivity and risk transmission dynamics among geopolitical risk, global oil price uncertainty, US-China trade tensions, and energy-related uncertainty. The study reveals quantile-specific and temporal disparities in the evolution of risk transmission across calm and crisis periods using monthly data from March 1996 to December 2023. Significant events like the Iraq War, the worldwide financial crisis, the COVID-19 epidemic, and the Russia-Ukraine war correspond with notable peaks in overall connection. The results show that oil price volatility and geopolitical risks are primary risk transmitters, mainly affecting energy-related uncertainty, which is always the biggest recipient of spillovers. These findings highlight the necessity of adaptive, quantile-specific policies to reduce systemic vulnerabilities and efficiently manage global risks in stable and tumultuous times.
跨领域风险:剖析全球石油不确定性、地缘政治紧张局势、能源波动和中美贸易紧张局势之间的关系
世界政治和经济机构之间日益紧密的联系使它们面临一系列危险,包括贸易紧张局势、地缘政治冲突、石油价格波动和能源市场的不确定性。尽管理解这些相互关联的动态是至关重要的,但许多研究都集中在单个风险变量上,忽略了分位数和波动的市场条件之间更广泛的系统联系。本研究使用一种新的广义分位数对分位数连通性技术,通过研究地缘政治风险、全球油价不确定性、美中贸易紧张局势和能源相关不确定性之间的互联性和风险传递动态,填补了这一空白。该研究利用1996年3月至2023年12月的月度数据揭示了平静期和危机期风险传播演变的分位数特异性和时间差异。伊拉克战争、全球金融危机、新冠肺炎疫情、俄乌战争等重大事件与总体连接的显著峰值相对应。结果表明,油价波动和地缘政治风险是主要的风险传导因素,主要影响能源相关的不确定性,而能源相关的不确定性始终是溢出效应的最大接受者。这些发现突出表明,在稳定和动荡时期,有必要采取适应性的、分位数特定的政策,以减少系统性脆弱性,并有效管理全球风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信