Determinants of effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance: Insights from Zambia’s environment and climate change actors

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kangacepe Zulu , Ernest Ezeani , Zhara Salimi , Easton Simenti-Phiri , Chitembo Kawimbe Chunga , Paul Musanda , Palicha Halwiindi
{"title":"Determinants of effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance: Insights from Zambia’s environment and climate change actors","authors":"Kangacepe Zulu ,&nbsp;Ernest Ezeani ,&nbsp;Zhara Salimi ,&nbsp;Easton Simenti-Phiri ,&nbsp;Chitembo Kawimbe Chunga ,&nbsp;Paul Musanda ,&nbsp;Palicha Halwiindi","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Participatory governance has widely been emphasised as essential to achieving SDG 13. However, recent studies have tended to focus on climate change impacts or global-level politics and governance, to the exclusion of providing practical country-level multi-actor climate governance solutions. Our study bridges this gap by examining the determinants of effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance. The objectives were to examine the current state of Zambia’s climate change governance and policy environment, to examine the elements required to actualise participatory multi-actor climate change governance, and to develop a Climate Action Coordination (CAC) Model of participatory multi-actor governance. Using semi-structured interviews with policy-level actors and a survey of implementation-level actors, we find that Zambia’s current climate governance architecture is characterised by intricate political, policy, institutional, and coordination challenges. Despite these complexities, our study reveals that effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance is contingent upon a deep understanding of the prevailing political dynamics and the effective navigation of political interference by climate actor institutions. Within such a political context, a multi-tiered governance institutional framework is essential, anchored on both an influential political authority and robust multi-level technical autonomy. Our results also identify various determinants such as: broad stakeholder inclusion; clarity of roles; decentralisation of decision making, with safeguards to limit policy reversals; harnessing of indigenous knowledge; alignment to the broader national development agenda; adequate financing; leveraging the influence of global commitments; and establishing parliamentary oversight mechanisms, among others. We synthesised these determinants into a practical CAC Model that cuts across the different administrative and sectoral tiers of climate change governance. Our study is unique as it offers a broad, multifaceted, and practical consideration of the determinants of climate change governance. This is particularly useful for a country like Zambia that has embarked on ambitious environmental and climate change sector reforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104040"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory governance has widely been emphasised as essential to achieving SDG 13. However, recent studies have tended to focus on climate change impacts or global-level politics and governance, to the exclusion of providing practical country-level multi-actor climate governance solutions. Our study bridges this gap by examining the determinants of effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance. The objectives were to examine the current state of Zambia’s climate change governance and policy environment, to examine the elements required to actualise participatory multi-actor climate change governance, and to develop a Climate Action Coordination (CAC) Model of participatory multi-actor governance. Using semi-structured interviews with policy-level actors and a survey of implementation-level actors, we find that Zambia’s current climate governance architecture is characterised by intricate political, policy, institutional, and coordination challenges. Despite these complexities, our study reveals that effective participatory multi-actor climate change governance is contingent upon a deep understanding of the prevailing political dynamics and the effective navigation of political interference by climate actor institutions. Within such a political context, a multi-tiered governance institutional framework is essential, anchored on both an influential political authority and robust multi-level technical autonomy. Our results also identify various determinants such as: broad stakeholder inclusion; clarity of roles; decentralisation of decision making, with safeguards to limit policy reversals; harnessing of indigenous knowledge; alignment to the broader national development agenda; adequate financing; leveraging the influence of global commitments; and establishing parliamentary oversight mechanisms, among others. We synthesised these determinants into a practical CAC Model that cuts across the different administrative and sectoral tiers of climate change governance. Our study is unique as it offers a broad, multifaceted, and practical consideration of the determinants of climate change governance. This is particularly useful for a country like Zambia that has embarked on ambitious environmental and climate change sector reforms.
有效参与式多主体气候变化治理的决定因素:来自赞比亚环境和气候变化主体的见解
参与式治理被广泛强调为实现可持续发展目标13的关键。然而,最近的研究倾向于关注气候变化的影响或全球层面的政治和治理,而不是提供实际的国家层面的多参与者气候治理解决方案。我们的研究通过考察有效的参与式多主体气候变化治理的决定因素,弥合了这一差距。目的是研究赞比亚气候变化治理和政策环境的现状,研究实现参与式多主体气候变化治理所需的要素,并制定参与式多主体治理的气候行动协调(CAC)模型。通过对政策层面行为者的半结构化访谈和对实施层面行为者的调查,我们发现赞比亚当前的气候治理架构具有复杂的政治、政策、制度和协调挑战的特点。尽管存在这些复杂性,但我们的研究表明,有效的参与式多主体气候变化治理取决于对当前政治动态的深刻理解和气候主体机构对政治干预的有效引导。在这样的政治背景下,多层次的治理制度框架至关重要,它既要以有影响力的政治权威为基础,又要以强有力的多层次技术自主权为基础。我们的结果还确定了各种决定因素,例如:广泛的利益相关者包容;明确角色;决策权力下放,并设有限制政策逆转的保障措施;利用本土知识;与更广泛的国家发展议程保持一致;足够的资金;利用全球承诺的影响;建立议会监督机制等。我们将这些决定因素综合到一个实用的CAC模型中,该模型跨越了气候变化治理的不同行政和部门层次。我们的研究是独一无二的,因为它对气候变化治理的决定因素进行了广泛、多方面和实际的考虑。这对于像赞比亚这样已经开始进行雄心勃勃的环境和气候变化部门改革的国家尤其有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信