Greening streets, gaining insights: Unpacking resident perceptions of urban greening

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Chaeri Kim , Aida D. Arik
{"title":"Greening streets, gaining insights: Unpacking resident perceptions of urban greening","authors":"Chaeri Kim ,&nbsp;Aida D. Arik","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the world becomes more urbanized, the need for managing urban stormwater runoff has increased. Cities are increasingly adopting green infrastructure (GI), such as rain gardens and street trees, to capture and treat stormwater on-site more cost-effectively than traditional gray infrastructure, such as sewers and pipes, which are designed to convey stormwater to nearby waterbodies. In addition to managing stormwater, GI offers co-benefits, including improved air quality, reduced heat, and enhanced neighborhood aesthetics. Streets are often a primary target for GI implementation, as they comprise a large portion of impervious surfaces in urban areas. Previous studies suggest that increasing public awareness of GI benefits can boost support for such projects, encourage participation, and even influence behavior change. However, misunderstanding or a lack of awareness about GI can create additional barriers, amplifying public concerns and hindering implementation progress. Addressing these misconceptions and understanding public concerns are critical steps in overcoming potential obstacles to support. This study synthesizes literature on anticipated co-benefits from GI and investigates general perceptions toward GI on streets and factors in influencing perception, the specific benefits and concerns that are valued, as well as how these relate to familiarity with GI or environmental awareness. We conducted resident surveys in two cities, New York City and Philadelphia, that have implemented GI on streets since around the 2010s. The results suggest that understanding the purpose of GI can increase both awareness of its benefits and doubts about its potential concerns. The findings imply that effective community communication, which clearly explains the benefits provided and addresses concerns, can better foster public support for GI. This study provides valuable insights for urban planners and GI practitioners, offering a more nuanced understanding to guide the development of targeted community engagement and education strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128775"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the world becomes more urbanized, the need for managing urban stormwater runoff has increased. Cities are increasingly adopting green infrastructure (GI), such as rain gardens and street trees, to capture and treat stormwater on-site more cost-effectively than traditional gray infrastructure, such as sewers and pipes, which are designed to convey stormwater to nearby waterbodies. In addition to managing stormwater, GI offers co-benefits, including improved air quality, reduced heat, and enhanced neighborhood aesthetics. Streets are often a primary target for GI implementation, as they comprise a large portion of impervious surfaces in urban areas. Previous studies suggest that increasing public awareness of GI benefits can boost support for such projects, encourage participation, and even influence behavior change. However, misunderstanding or a lack of awareness about GI can create additional barriers, amplifying public concerns and hindering implementation progress. Addressing these misconceptions and understanding public concerns are critical steps in overcoming potential obstacles to support. This study synthesizes literature on anticipated co-benefits from GI and investigates general perceptions toward GI on streets and factors in influencing perception, the specific benefits and concerns that are valued, as well as how these relate to familiarity with GI or environmental awareness. We conducted resident surveys in two cities, New York City and Philadelphia, that have implemented GI on streets since around the 2010s. The results suggest that understanding the purpose of GI can increase both awareness of its benefits and doubts about its potential concerns. The findings imply that effective community communication, which clearly explains the benefits provided and addresses concerns, can better foster public support for GI. This study provides valuable insights for urban planners and GI practitioners, offering a more nuanced understanding to guide the development of targeted community engagement and education strategies.
绿化街道,获取见解:解读居民对城市绿化的看法
随着世界城市化程度的提高,管理城市雨水径流的需求也在增加。城市越来越多地采用绿色基础设施(GI),如雨水花园和行道树,以比传统的灰色基础设施(如下水道和管道)更经济有效地收集和处理雨水,这些基础设施旨在将雨水输送到附近的水体。除了管理雨水外,地理标志还提供了其他好处,包括改善空气质量、减少热量和增强社区美观。街道通常是地理标志实施的主要目标,因为它们占城市地区不透水表面的很大一部分。先前的研究表明,提高公众对GI福利的认识可以增加对此类项目的支持,鼓励参与,甚至影响行为改变。然而,对地理标志的误解或缺乏认识可能会造成额外的障碍,扩大公众的关注并阻碍实施进展。消除这些误解和了解公众关切是克服潜在支持障碍的关键步骤。本研究综合了有关地理标志预期共同利益的文献,并调查了街道上对地理标志的一般看法和影响看法的因素,所重视的具体利益和关注点,以及这些与熟悉地理标志或环境意识之间的关系。我们在纽约市和费城两个城市进行了居民调查,这两个城市从2010年代左右开始在街道上实施地理标志。结果表明,了解地理标志的目的可以增加对其益处的认识,也可以增加对其潜在问题的怀疑。研究结果表明,有效的社区沟通可以更好地促进公众对地理标志的支持,从而清楚地解释所提供的好处并解决所关注的问题。这项研究为城市规划者和地理标志从业者提供了有价值的见解,为指导有针对性的社区参与和教育战略的发展提供了更细致入微的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信