Helen Huband , Kaitlin M McGarragle , Crystal J Hare , Melyssa Aronson , Thomas Ward , Kara Semotiuk , Sarah E Ferguson , Zane Cohen , Tae L Hart
{"title":"Psychological impact of risk-reducing surgery for gynecologic cancer among women with Lynch syndrome","authors":"Helen Huband , Kaitlin M McGarragle , Crystal J Hare , Melyssa Aronson , Thomas Ward , Kara Semotiuk , Sarah E Ferguson , Zane Cohen , Tae L Hart","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Prophylactic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) that can be offered to women with Lynch syndrome (LS) as they reduce the incidence of ovarian and endometrial cancer. Few studies have examined facilitators to RRS or the experiences of women with LS post-surgery. This qualitative study explored the experiences of women with LS who underwent RRS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Women with LS who had undergone RRS within the prior 10 years were recruited from a genetic cancer registry and a tertiary care medical centre in Canada. Participants completed interviews over the phone. A qualitative descriptive methodological approach was taken, and interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen participants completed interviews. Themes identified included: 1) facilitators to RRS including desire for peace of mind, completed family planning, presence of physical symptoms associated with gynecologic cancer, burden of screening, personal or family history of cancer, age, and trust in healthcare providers (HCPs); 2) women’s experiences with RRS including post-surgical recovery, long-term physical changes post-surgery, impact of surgery on sexual health, psychological impacts of managing risk, and post-surgical care from HCPs; 3) experiences managing menopausal symptoms and use of hormone replacement therapy; and 4) unmet informational needs including managing expectations prior to surgery, understanding risk related to other health conditions, and questions about the ongoing need for gynecologic cancer surveillance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>HCPs should consider facilitators to surgery in women with LS contemplating RRS. HCPs should also provide women with LS more detailed post-surgery information on what to expect, and risks of other health conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892500044X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Prophylactic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are risk-reducing surgeries (RRS) that can be offered to women with Lynch syndrome (LS) as they reduce the incidence of ovarian and endometrial cancer. Few studies have examined facilitators to RRS or the experiences of women with LS post-surgery. This qualitative study explored the experiences of women with LS who underwent RRS.
Methods
Women with LS who had undergone RRS within the prior 10 years were recruited from a genetic cancer registry and a tertiary care medical centre in Canada. Participants completed interviews over the phone. A qualitative descriptive methodological approach was taken, and interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results
Fifteen participants completed interviews. Themes identified included: 1) facilitators to RRS including desire for peace of mind, completed family planning, presence of physical symptoms associated with gynecologic cancer, burden of screening, personal or family history of cancer, age, and trust in healthcare providers (HCPs); 2) women’s experiences with RRS including post-surgical recovery, long-term physical changes post-surgery, impact of surgery on sexual health, psychological impacts of managing risk, and post-surgical care from HCPs; 3) experiences managing menopausal symptoms and use of hormone replacement therapy; and 4) unmet informational needs including managing expectations prior to surgery, understanding risk related to other health conditions, and questions about the ongoing need for gynecologic cancer surveillance.
Conclusions
HCPs should consider facilitators to surgery in women with LS contemplating RRS. HCPs should also provide women with LS more detailed post-surgery information on what to expect, and risks of other health conditions.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.