Strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a survey of Difficult Airway Society members

Moon-Moon Majumdar , Natalie Silvey , Abhijoy Chakladar , Barry McGuire , Ellen O’Sullivan , Alistair F. McNarry
{"title":"Strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation: a survey of Difficult Airway Society members","authors":"Moon-Moon Majumdar ,&nbsp;Natalie Silvey ,&nbsp;Abhijoy Chakladar ,&nbsp;Barry McGuire ,&nbsp;Ellen O’Sullivan ,&nbsp;Alistair F. McNarry","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite multiple initiatives and consensus guidelines, preventable deaths from unrecognised oesophageal intubation continue worldwide. We aimed to establish what different organisations are doing to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a cross-sectional survey of Difficult Airway Society (DAS) members using an internet-based survey platform. Members were invited to participate via e-mail over a period of 10 weeks (28 March to 07 June 2023). Results were reported according to the CROSS checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The response rate was 39% (819/2125). About 50% (402/799) of respondents were providing training to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation and 9% (69/799) were planning to. Most of the training (69%; 310/449) is multidisciplinary. However, almost one-third of respondents (31%; 246/799) were from departments that were not planning any training. Non-training-related strategies (including but not limited to increased use of videolaryngoscopy, increased use or improving the interpretability of waveform capnography) were implemented in 39% (297/765) of respondents' departments and planned in 8% (60/765). Nearly one-third (31%; 237/765) were not planning any non-training interventions to reduce risk. Of those who responded, 17% (130/765) were from departments not planning <em>any</em> strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation. <em>Two-person verbal confirmation of capnography</em> was considered ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ helpful by 59% (411/702) of respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study suggests that uptake of preventative strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation remains inadequate. The authors suggest it is now time for the Royal College of Anaesthetists, DAS, and the General Medical Council to mandate strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609625000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite multiple initiatives and consensus guidelines, preventable deaths from unrecognised oesophageal intubation continue worldwide. We aimed to establish what different organisations are doing to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey of Difficult Airway Society (DAS) members using an internet-based survey platform. Members were invited to participate via e-mail over a period of 10 weeks (28 March to 07 June 2023). Results were reported according to the CROSS checklist.

Results

The response rate was 39% (819/2125). About 50% (402/799) of respondents were providing training to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation and 9% (69/799) were planning to. Most of the training (69%; 310/449) is multidisciplinary. However, almost one-third of respondents (31%; 246/799) were from departments that were not planning any training. Non-training-related strategies (including but not limited to increased use of videolaryngoscopy, increased use or improving the interpretability of waveform capnography) were implemented in 39% (297/765) of respondents' departments and planned in 8% (60/765). Nearly one-third (31%; 237/765) were not planning any non-training interventions to reduce risk. Of those who responded, 17% (130/765) were from departments not planning any strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Two-person verbal confirmation of capnography was considered ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ helpful by 59% (411/702) of respondents.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that uptake of preventative strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation remains inadequate. The authors suggest it is now time for the Royal College of Anaesthetists, DAS, and the General Medical Council to mandate strategies to reduce the risk of unrecognised oesophageal intubation.
降低未识别的食管插管风险的策略:一项对困难气道协会成员的调查
背景:尽管有多项倡议和共识指南,但世界范围内因未识别的食管插管导致的可预防死亡仍在继续。我们的目的是确定不同的组织正在做什么来降低未被识别的食管插管的风险。方法采用基于互联网的调查平台对困难气道学会(DAS)会员进行横断面调查。会员被邀请通过电子邮件参与,为期10周(2023年3月28日至6月7日)。根据CROSS检查表报告结果。结果总有效率为39%(819/2125)。约50%(402/799)的受访者正在提供培训,以降低未被识别的食管插管风险,9%(69/799)的受访者计划提供培训。大部分的培训(69%;310/449)是多学科的。然而,近三分之一的受访者(31%;246/799)来自没有计划任何培训的部门。39%(297/765)的受访科室实施了与培训无关的策略(包括但不限于增加视频喉镜检查的使用,增加使用或提高波形超声的可解释性),8%(60/765)的科室计划实施该策略。近三分之一(31%;237/765)没有计划任何非培训干预措施来降低风险。在这些回应中,17%(130/765)来自没有计划任何策略来降低未识别的食管插管风险的部门。59%(411/702)的受访者认为,两人口头确认摄片“非常”或“非常”有帮助。结论我们的研究表明,采取预防措施来降低未被识别的食管插管风险仍然不足。作者建议,现在是皇家麻醉师学院(DAS)和总医学委员会(General Medical Council)制定策略以降低未被识别的食管插管风险的时候了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信