Addressing structural certification challenges with FEM analysis in electric seaplane CFRP wing

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Jonathan Tapullima, Bjørn Haugen
{"title":"Addressing structural certification challenges with FEM analysis in electric seaplane CFRP wing","authors":"Jonathan Tapullima,&nbsp;Bjørn Haugen","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the structural certification challenges and business objectives for an electric seaplane in the general aviation category, emphasizing the verification of the composite structure under EASA CS-23. Sandwich structures and bonded joints offer significant weight reduction and structural efficiency advantages, crucial for electric aircraft. However, a fatigue damage and tolerance evaluation under CS-23 Level 4 increase these challenges, requiring exhaustive testing, analysis, and documentation to meet stringent regulatory standards. Certification complexities are further intensified by the differences in passenger capacity constraints between Level 3 and Level 4 aircraft, suggesting pursuing Level 3 certification and impacting on the business case of the emerging sustainable aviation. To evaluate the impact on the weight penalties, this study conducts a comprehensive FEM validation and comparison of two different CFRP wing structural analyses: one to comply with Level 3 certification using a monocoque sandwich structure with a bonded assembly, and the other to comply with Level 4 certification using semi-monocoque with a mechanically fastened assembly. The use of different strain allowable values for both levels defined the current strain constraints range for the composite wings, where the monocoque structure analysis showed a mass reduction of up to 19 % on average.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100584"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the structural certification challenges and business objectives for an electric seaplane in the general aviation category, emphasizing the verification of the composite structure under EASA CS-23. Sandwich structures and bonded joints offer significant weight reduction and structural efficiency advantages, crucial for electric aircraft. However, a fatigue damage and tolerance evaluation under CS-23 Level 4 increase these challenges, requiring exhaustive testing, analysis, and documentation to meet stringent regulatory standards. Certification complexities are further intensified by the differences in passenger capacity constraints between Level 3 and Level 4 aircraft, suggesting pursuing Level 3 certification and impacting on the business case of the emerging sustainable aviation. To evaluate the impact on the weight penalties, this study conducts a comprehensive FEM validation and comparison of two different CFRP wing structural analyses: one to comply with Level 3 certification using a monocoque sandwich structure with a bonded assembly, and the other to comply with Level 4 certification using semi-monocoque with a mechanically fastened assembly. The use of different strain allowable values for both levels defined the current strain constraints range for the composite wings, where the monocoque structure analysis showed a mass reduction of up to 19 % on average.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信