Sean M. Patrick , Joyce Shirinde , Kableo Kgarosi , Takalani Makinthisa , Rico Euripidou , Victor Munnik
{"title":"Just energy transition from coal in South Africa: A scoping review","authors":"Sean M. Patrick , Joyce Shirinde , Kableo Kgarosi , Takalani Makinthisa , Rico Euripidou , Victor Munnik","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.
Objective
This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.
Results
Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.
Conclusion
To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.