Just energy transition from coal in South Africa: A scoping review

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sean M. Patrick , Joyce Shirinde , Kableo Kgarosi , Takalani Makinthisa , Rico Euripidou , Victor Munnik
{"title":"Just energy transition from coal in South Africa: A scoping review","authors":"Sean M. Patrick ,&nbsp;Joyce Shirinde ,&nbsp;Kableo Kgarosi ,&nbsp;Takalani Makinthisa ,&nbsp;Rico Euripidou ,&nbsp;Victor Munnik","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.

Objective

This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.

Results

Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.

Conclusion

To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信