Sean M. Patrick , Joyce Shirinde , Kableo Kgarosi , Takalani Makinthisa , Rico Euripidou , Victor Munnik
{"title":"Just energy transition from coal in South Africa: A scoping review","authors":"Sean M. Patrick , Joyce Shirinde , Kableo Kgarosi , Takalani Makinthisa , Rico Euripidou , Victor Munnik","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
South Africa’s just energy transition (JET) aims to reduce coal dependency and shift toward a low-carbon, sustainable energy framework. However, achieving this goal requires addressing the socio-economic, health, and environmental burdens that coal dependency has placed on communities, particularly in regions like Mpumalanga. Integrating principles of social and restorative justice is essential to ensure an equitable transition.
Objective
This scoping review examine how South Africa's policymaking, regulatory frameworks, and public participation in the JET align with principles of social and restorative justice and global energy transition frameworks.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify relevant studies on energy transition and justice frameworks. Network analysis was employed to compare South Africa’s JET strategies with global trends, focusing on indicators related to health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts.
Results
Findings reveal significant challenges in South Africa’s JET, including regulatory limitations, stakeholder conflicts, and gaps in policy alignment with community needs. Although efforts to incorporate justice principles are emerging, disparities in policy implementation suggest the need for more tailored, inclusive approaches. Network analysis identified both overlaps and gaps between South Africa’s JET policies and international frameworks, particularly in areas of public health and social equity.
Conclusion
To achieve a balanced and inclusive energy transition, the study recommends strengthening regulatory coherence, enhancing public engagement, and implementing concrete actions for social and restorative justice. Aligning domestic policies with international commitments while addressing local socio-economic conditions is critical for South Africa’s JET to serve as a model for coal-dependent economies globally.
南非的能源转型(JET)旨在减少对煤炭的依赖,向低碳、可持续的能源框架转变。然而,实现这一目标需要解决煤炭依赖给社区带来的社会经济、健康和环境负担,特别是在普马兰加省等地区。综合社会司法和恢复性司法原则对于确保公平过渡至关重要。本范围审查审查了南非在JET中的政策制定、监管框架和公众参与如何与社会和恢复性司法原则以及全球能源转型框架保持一致。方法系统检索Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed等数据库,查找能源转型与司法框架的相关研究。采用网络分析将南非的JET战略与全球趋势进行比较,重点关注与健康、环境和社会经济影响有关的指标。研究结果揭示了南非JET面临的重大挑战,包括监管限制、利益相关者冲突以及政策与社区需求的差距。虽然正在努力纳入司法原则,但政策执行方面的差异表明,需要采取更有针对性、更具包容性的办法。网络分析确定了南非JET政策与国际框架之间的重叠和差距,特别是在公共卫生和社会公平领域。为了实现平衡和包容性的能源转型,该研究建议加强监管一致性,加强公众参与,并采取具体行动促进社会正义和恢复性正义。使国内政策与国际承诺保持一致,同时解决当地的社会经济状况,对于南非的JET成为全球依赖煤炭的经济体的典范至关重要。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.