{"title":"Analysis of mathematical modelling approaches to capture human behaviour dynamics in agricultural pest and disease systems","authors":"Nadine Aschauer , Stephen Parnell","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>The integration of dynamic human behaviour into epidemiological models aims to improve the effectiveness of pest and disease management in crops and livestock, crucial for sustainable food and agriculture systems, especially amid current challenges such as climate change, globalisation and chemical use.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This structured scoping review focuses on how dynamic human behaviour is integrated into mathematical models for pest and disease control, using mathematical frameworks such as game theory and agent-based modelling, providing a comprehensive analysis of literature from the last decade.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>To identify and assess relevant studies, an extensive and systematic search for literature was conducted using the Web of Science database, followed by a manual screening process.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Most studies focused on stochastic and spatially explicit types of models that capture the complexity of agricultural pest and disease systems. Various control strategies, including chemical control, cultural methods, and integrated pest management, are identified, highlighting the presence of context-specific approaches in epidemiological models, considering diversity of agricultural systems and heterogeneity in farmer behaviour. The review also identifies gaps in current research, such as the limited focus on dyadic behaviours (e.g. farmer-to-advisor interactions), limited interdisciplinary collaboration, and reliance on secondary data sources. By addressing these gaps, a more comprehensive and practical understanding of the dynamics within agricultural systems, particularly in relation to human behaviour can be achieved.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Modellers are encouraged to foster interdisciplinary work with social scientists and collection of primary social data to better capture human behaviour for modelling agricultural pest and disease systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 104303"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25000435","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
The integration of dynamic human behaviour into epidemiological models aims to improve the effectiveness of pest and disease management in crops and livestock, crucial for sustainable food and agriculture systems, especially amid current challenges such as climate change, globalisation and chemical use.
OBJECTIVE
This structured scoping review focuses on how dynamic human behaviour is integrated into mathematical models for pest and disease control, using mathematical frameworks such as game theory and agent-based modelling, providing a comprehensive analysis of literature from the last decade.
METHODS
To identify and assess relevant studies, an extensive and systematic search for literature was conducted using the Web of Science database, followed by a manual screening process.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Most studies focused on stochastic and spatially explicit types of models that capture the complexity of agricultural pest and disease systems. Various control strategies, including chemical control, cultural methods, and integrated pest management, are identified, highlighting the presence of context-specific approaches in epidemiological models, considering diversity of agricultural systems and heterogeneity in farmer behaviour. The review also identifies gaps in current research, such as the limited focus on dyadic behaviours (e.g. farmer-to-advisor interactions), limited interdisciplinary collaboration, and reliance on secondary data sources. By addressing these gaps, a more comprehensive and practical understanding of the dynamics within agricultural systems, particularly in relation to human behaviour can be achieved.
SIGNIFICANCE
Modellers are encouraged to foster interdisciplinary work with social scientists and collection of primary social data to better capture human behaviour for modelling agricultural pest and disease systems.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.