Predictors of Academic Productivity in Cardiac Surgeons: Quality Over Quantity

IF 1.8 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.033

Anirudha S. Chandrabhatla MD , Adishesh K. Narahari MD, PhD , Emily D. Fronk MD , Aditya Singh BA , Kennedy Gray BA , Kevin T. Qiu BA , Theodore Vasiliadis BA , Joseph D. Nguyen BS , Nicholas R. Teman MD , John A. Kern MD , Ourania A. Preventza MD, MBA , J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc , Mark E. Roeser MD

{"title":"Predictors of Academic Productivity in Cardiac Surgeons: Quality Over Quantity","authors":"Anirudha S. Chandrabhatla MD , Adishesh K. Narahari MD, PhD , Emily D. Fronk MD , Aditya Singh BA , Kennedy Gray BA , Kevin T. Qiu BA , Theodore Vasiliadis BA , Joseph D. Nguyen BS , Nicholas R. Teman MD , John A. Kern MD , Ourania A. Preventza MD, MBA , J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, MSc , Mark E. Roeser MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Building a successful academic career is challenging. It is unclear which metrics of academic productivity best predict future success for cardiac surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We collected academic cardiac surgeon profiles from the top 140 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded institutions. Publication information was obtained from Web of Science and the NIH <em>iCite</em> tool. Grant information was collected from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Data were categorized into distinct time periods as follows for each surgeon: last 5 y of training (senior trainee), first 5 y as an attending (junior faculty), and after 5 y as an attending (established faculty). The primary outcomes of: (1) publications as established faculty and (2) receiving a K08 or R01 were analyzed using linear and logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 972 academic cardiac surgeons. Total publications as established faculty were predicted by citations per year of papers published as a senior trainee (<em>P</em> = 0.015) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (<em>P</em> = 0.14). The proportion of basic or translational research (<em>P</em> = 0.27) and first author publications as a senior trainee (<em>P</em> = 0.18) did not predict total publications as established faculty. Being awarded a K08 or R01 was predicted by the number of publications as junior faculty (<em>P</em> = 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.02) and whether the surgeon was awarded an F32 (<em>P</em> = 0.0004; OR 3.97) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (<em>P</em> = 0.49; OR 1.01). Publishing a higher proportion of senior author papers as junior faculty also predicted being awarded a K08 or R01 (<em>P</em> < 0.001; OR 17.15). The surgeons in the top quartile by publication volume varied substantially across career time points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Research quality, not quantity, as a trainee predicts future academic productivity as an attending. Cardiac surgery trainees should prioritize learning how to conduct high-quality research and apply those skills as early attendings to position themselves for future academic success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 216-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000940","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Building a successful academic career is challenging. It is unclear which metrics of academic productivity best predict future success for cardiac surgeons.

Methods

We collected academic cardiac surgeon profiles from the top 140 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded institutions. Publication information was obtained from Web of Science and the NIH iCite tool. Grant information was collected from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Expenditures and Results. Data were categorized into distinct time periods as follows for each surgeon: last 5 y of training (senior trainee), first 5 y as an attending (junior faculty), and after 5 y as an attending (established faculty). The primary outcomes of: (1) publications as established faculty and (2) receiving a K08 or R01 were analyzed using linear and logistic regression.

Results

We analyzed 972 academic cardiac surgeons. Total publications as established faculty were predicted by citations per year of papers published as a senior trainee (P = 0.015) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.14). The proportion of basic or translational research (P = 0.27) and first author publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.18) did not predict total publications as established faculty. Being awarded a K08 or R01 was predicted by the number of publications as junior faculty (P = 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 1.02) and whether the surgeon was awarded an F32 (P = 0.0004; OR 3.97) but not the number of publications as a senior trainee (P = 0.49; OR 1.01). Publishing a higher proportion of senior author papers as junior faculty also predicted being awarded a K08 or R01 (P < 0.001; OR 17.15). The surgeons in the top quartile by publication volume varied substantially across career time points.

Conclusions

Research quality, not quantity, as a trainee predicts future academic productivity as an attending. Cardiac surgery trainees should prioritize learning how to conduct high-quality research and apply those skills as early attendings to position themselves for future academic success.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Surgical Research 医学-外科

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

4.50%

发文量

627

审稿时长

138 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.