Emily J.R. Carter BS , Matthew S. Linz MD , Lea C. George MD , Aleena Dar MD , Vivienne Qie MD , Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing MD , David Howard MD, PhD
{"title":"Operative Mortality for Male Versus Female Surgeons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Emily J.R. Carter BS , Matthew S. Linz MD , Lea C. George MD , Aleena Dar MD , Vivienne Qie MD , Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing MD , David Howard MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This systematic review synthesizes published data concerning whether there is a difference in mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons compared to patients operated on by male surgeons. Several studies have attempted to compare surgical outcomes, including operative mortality, of male surgeons <em>versus</em> female surgeons. These studies include many different surgical subspecialties and surgery types. Despite current research on this topic, there has yet to be a published systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesizing these studies’ findings on operative mortality. This systematic review objectively synthesizes the current published data regarding mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons as compared to male surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included patients of any age and sex undergoing any kind of surgical procedure in North America. This review considered all studies that evaluated the performance of any type of surgical procedure by female <em>versus</em> male surgeons and included intraoperative or postoperative mortality as outcomes. Eligible studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and for quality using standardized instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Studies were pooled for raw outcomes for statistical meta-analysis including operative mortality counts and rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model. A forest plot was created to compare study associations and significance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded five retrospective cohort studies published between 2000 and 2018 including various surgical subspecialties. In total, 1,055,122 operations were included, performed by 6139 female surgeons and 47,666 male surgeons. There were 4176 deaths among patients operated on by female surgeons and 55,666 among patients operated on by male surgeons, respectively. Forest plot analysis found no evidence of a difference between male and female surgeon mortality rate among the studies (pooled odds ratio 0.96 [0.88-1.05]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All five studies provided odds ratios for mortality and four of five provided counts for mortality. There was no statistical difference in mortality between male and female surgeons among the studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This systematic review synthesizes published data concerning whether there is a difference in mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons compared to patients operated on by male surgeons. Several studies have attempted to compare surgical outcomes, including operative mortality, of male surgeons versus female surgeons. These studies include many different surgical subspecialties and surgery types. Despite current research on this topic, there has yet to be a published systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesizing these studies’ findings on operative mortality. This systematic review objectively synthesizes the current published data regarding mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons as compared to male surgeons.
Methods
The study included patients of any age and sex undergoing any kind of surgical procedure in North America. This review considered all studies that evaluated the performance of any type of surgical procedure by female versus male surgeons and included intraoperative or postoperative mortality as outcomes. Eligible studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and for quality using standardized instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Studies were pooled for raw outcomes for statistical meta-analysis including operative mortality counts and rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model. A forest plot was created to compare study associations and significance.
Results
The search yielded five retrospective cohort studies published between 2000 and 2018 including various surgical subspecialties. In total, 1,055,122 operations were included, performed by 6139 female surgeons and 47,666 male surgeons. There were 4176 deaths among patients operated on by female surgeons and 55,666 among patients operated on by male surgeons, respectively. Forest plot analysis found no evidence of a difference between male and female surgeon mortality rate among the studies (pooled odds ratio 0.96 [0.88-1.05]).
Conclusions
All five studies provided odds ratios for mortality and four of five provided counts for mortality. There was no statistical difference in mortality between male and female surgeons among the studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.