Operative Mortality for Male Versus Female Surgeons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Emily J.R. Carter BS , Matthew S. Linz MD , Lea C. George MD , Aleena Dar MD , Vivienne Qie MD , Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing MD , David Howard MD, PhD
{"title":"Operative Mortality for Male Versus Female Surgeons: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Emily J.R. Carter BS ,&nbsp;Matthew S. Linz MD ,&nbsp;Lea C. George MD ,&nbsp;Aleena Dar MD ,&nbsp;Vivienne Qie MD ,&nbsp;Melissa M. Alvarez-Downing MD ,&nbsp;David Howard MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This systematic review synthesizes published data concerning whether there is a difference in mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons compared to patients operated on by male surgeons. Several studies have attempted to compare surgical outcomes, including operative mortality, of male surgeons <em>versus</em> female surgeons. These studies include many different surgical subspecialties and surgery types. Despite current research on this topic, there has yet to be a published systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesizing these studies’ findings on operative mortality. This systematic review objectively synthesizes the current published data regarding mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons as compared to male surgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included patients of any age and sex undergoing any kind of surgical procedure in North America. This review considered all studies that evaluated the performance of any type of surgical procedure by female <em>versus</em> male surgeons and included intraoperative or postoperative mortality as outcomes. Eligible studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and for quality using standardized instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Studies were pooled for raw outcomes for statistical meta-analysis including operative mortality counts and rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model. A forest plot was created to compare study associations and significance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded five retrospective cohort studies published between 2000 and 2018 including various surgical subspecialties. In total, 1,055,122 operations were included, performed by 6139 female surgeons and 47,666 male surgeons. There were 4176 deaths among patients operated on by female surgeons and 55,666 among patients operated on by male surgeons, respectively. Forest plot analysis found no evidence of a difference between male and female surgeon mortality rate among the studies (pooled odds ratio 0.96 [0.88-1.05]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All five studies provided odds ratios for mortality and four of five provided counts for mortality. There was no statistical difference in mortality between male and female surgeons among the studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This systematic review synthesizes published data concerning whether there is a difference in mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons compared to patients operated on by male surgeons. Several studies have attempted to compare surgical outcomes, including operative mortality, of male surgeons versus female surgeons. These studies include many different surgical subspecialties and surgery types. Despite current research on this topic, there has yet to be a published systematic review and meta-analysis quantitatively synthesizing these studies’ findings on operative mortality. This systematic review objectively synthesizes the current published data regarding mortality rate for patients operated on by female surgeons as compared to male surgeons.

Methods

The study included patients of any age and sex undergoing any kind of surgical procedure in North America. This review considered all studies that evaluated the performance of any type of surgical procedure by female versus male surgeons and included intraoperative or postoperative mortality as outcomes. Eligible studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and for quality using standardized instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information. Studies were pooled for raw outcomes for statistical meta-analysis including operative mortality counts and rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model. A forest plot was created to compare study associations and significance.

Results

The search yielded five retrospective cohort studies published between 2000 and 2018 including various surgical subspecialties. In total, 1,055,122 operations were included, performed by 6139 female surgeons and 47,666 male surgeons. There were 4176 deaths among patients operated on by female surgeons and 55,666 among patients operated on by male surgeons, respectively. Forest plot analysis found no evidence of a difference between male and female surgeon mortality rate among the studies (pooled odds ratio 0.96 [0.88-1.05]).

Conclusions

All five studies provided odds ratios for mortality and four of five provided counts for mortality. There was no statistical difference in mortality between male and female surgeons among the studies.
导言:这篇系统性综述综合了已发表的有关女外科医生与男外科医生手术患者的死亡率是否存在差异的数据。有几项研究试图比较男外科医生和女外科医生的手术结果,包括手术死亡率。这些研究包括许多不同的外科亚专科和手术类型。尽管目前对这一主题进行了研究,但还没有公开发表的系统综述和荟萃分析对这些研究在手术死亡率方面的发现进行定量综合。本系统性综述客观地综合了目前已发表的有关女外科医生与男外科医生手术患者死亡率的数据。 研究对象包括在北美接受各种外科手术的任何年龄和性别的患者。本综述考虑了所有评估女外科医生与男外科医生实施任何类型外科手术的研究,并将术中或术后死亡率作为研究结果。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对符合条件的研究进行了偏倚风险评估,并采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所信息统一管理、评估和审核系统中的标准化工具对研究质量进行了评估。对研究的原始结果进行汇总,以进行统计荟萃分析,包括手术死亡率计数和比率。异质性采用 Cochran's Q 检验进行评估。统计分析采用随机效应模型。绘制了森林图,以比较研究的关联性和显著性。结果搜索结果显示,2000年至2018年期间发表了5项回顾性队列研究,包括各种外科亚专科。总共纳入了 1,055,122 例手术,由 6139 名女性外科医生和 47,666 名男性外科医生实施。在女外科医生和男外科医生的手术中,分别有4176名和55666名患者死亡。森林图分析发现,没有证据表明男性和女性外科医生的死亡率在各项研究中存在差异(汇总赔率为 0.96 [0.88-1.05])。在这些研究中,男性和女性外科医生的死亡率没有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信