Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Graft Function

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Matthew M. Byrne MD , Jenny Ganay-Vasquez BA , Marie L. Jacobs MD , Korry Wirth MD , Peter Hendzlik BS , John Martens MPH , M. Katherine Dokus MPH , Jennifer I. Melaragno PharmD , Hafsa Tariq MD , Jeremy Taylor MD , David DeWolfe MD , Amit Nair MBBS , Randeep Kashyap MD , Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro MD , Paula Cupertino PhD , Nicole A. Wilson PhD, MD , Karen Pineda-Solis MD
{"title":"Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Graft Function","authors":"Matthew M. Byrne MD ,&nbsp;Jenny Ganay-Vasquez BA ,&nbsp;Marie L. Jacobs MD ,&nbsp;Korry Wirth MD ,&nbsp;Peter Hendzlik BS ,&nbsp;John Martens MPH ,&nbsp;M. Katherine Dokus MPH ,&nbsp;Jennifer I. Melaragno PharmD ,&nbsp;Hafsa Tariq MD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Taylor MD ,&nbsp;David DeWolfe MD ,&nbsp;Amit Nair MBBS ,&nbsp;Randeep Kashyap MD ,&nbsp;Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro MD ,&nbsp;Paula Cupertino PhD ,&nbsp;Nicole A. Wilson PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Karen Pineda-Solis MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The study of social determinants of health in kidney transplantation has historically focused on equitable access, with limited evidence on the short- and long-term outcomes beyond graft loss and mortality. Our purpose is to identify and assess factors to ensure equitable outcomes after kidney transplant by identifying targets for health-care interventions in the posttransplant phase of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single institution, cohort study of adults who received deceased donor kidney transplantation at a high-volume transplant center. Transplant recipients were stratified by social deprivation index (SDI) at the population mean of 60. The primary outcome is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 236 recipients were included, 48% (<em>n</em> = 113) were from higher deprivation neighborhoods (SDI &gt;60). These recipients were younger, more likely to be black, and had lower estimated posttransplant survival scores. Both groups received grafts with similar kidney donor profile index scores. Despite similar discharge eGFR, recipients from high SDI neighborhoods had significantly lower eGFRs at all follow-up points, confirmed with mixed-effect analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recipients from neighborhoods with higher deprivation index have worse short- and long-term graft function, despite being younger, having lower estimated posttransplant survival scores, and similar graft kidney donor profile index at transplantation. This unexplained compromise in graft function is an opportunity for community-based interventions after recipients receive deceased donor kidney transplantation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"308 ","pages":"Pages 243-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480425000927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The study of social determinants of health in kidney transplantation has historically focused on equitable access, with limited evidence on the short- and long-term outcomes beyond graft loss and mortality. Our purpose is to identify and assess factors to ensure equitable outcomes after kidney transplant by identifying targets for health-care interventions in the posttransplant phase of care.

Methods

This is a single institution, cohort study of adults who received deceased donor kidney transplantation at a high-volume transplant center. Transplant recipients were stratified by social deprivation index (SDI) at the population mean of 60. The primary outcome is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Results

A total of 236 recipients were included, 48% (n = 113) were from higher deprivation neighborhoods (SDI >60). These recipients were younger, more likely to be black, and had lower estimated posttransplant survival scores. Both groups received grafts with similar kidney donor profile index scores. Despite similar discharge eGFR, recipients from high SDI neighborhoods had significantly lower eGFRs at all follow-up points, confirmed with mixed-effect analysis.

Conclusions

Recipients from neighborhoods with higher deprivation index have worse short- and long-term graft function, despite being younger, having lower estimated posttransplant survival scores, and similar graft kidney donor profile index at transplantation. This unexplained compromise in graft function is an opportunity for community-based interventions after recipients receive deceased donor kidney transplantation.
导言对肾移植中健康的社会决定因素的研究历来侧重于公平获取,而对移植物丢失和死亡率之外的短期和长期结果的证据却很有限。我们的目的是通过确定移植后护理阶段医疗干预的目标,确定并评估确保肾移植后公平结果的因素。方法这是一项单一机构的队列研究,研究对象是在一个高容量移植中心接受过已故供体肾移植的成年人。移植受者按照社会贫困指数(SDI)进行分层,社会贫困指数的人口平均值为 60。主要结果是估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的变化。结果共纳入 236 名受者,48%(n = 113)来自较贫困社区(SDI >60)。这些受者更年轻,更可能是黑人,估计移植后存活率较低。两组受者的肾脏捐献者资料指数得分相似。尽管出院时的eGFR相似,但来自高SDI社区的受者在所有随访点的eGFR都明显较低,这一点在混合效应分析中得到了证实。结论来自贫困指数较高社区的受者尽管更年轻、移植后估计存活分数更低、移植时的移植物肾脏供体特征指数相似,但其短期和长期移植物功能都较差。这种无法解释的移植物功能损害为受者接受死亡供体肾移植后的社区干预提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信