Rapid damage assessment and rotation angle model of EEP-HSSBC connections under post-fire earthquake using machine learning

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jixiang Xu, Yifan Zhang, Jianping Han
{"title":"Rapid damage assessment and rotation angle model of EEP-HSSBC connections under post-fire earthquake using machine learning","authors":"Jixiang Xu,&nbsp;Yifan Zhang,&nbsp;Jianping Han","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve accurate and rapid assessment of the seismic damage state of extended end-plate high-strength steel beam-column connections after fire, this study utilizes seven parameters as input variables: column width-to-thickness ratio, column height-to-thickness ratio, beam width-to-thickness ratio, beam height-to-thickness ratio, beam stiffener length-to-thickness ratio, temperature-induced damage, and seismic intensity levels. The output variable is the damage state of the connections under seismic loading after fire. Eight machine learning models were employed: Category Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors, Artificial Neural Network, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The results demonstrate that the Extreme Gradient Boosting model achieved the highest prediction accuracy (0.9) on the test set, followed by the Artificial Neural Network model (0.79). Among the models, the Decision Tree, Category Boosting, Artificial Neural Network, and Extreme Gradient Boosting models exhibited high recall and precision, with the Extreme Gradient Boosting model achieving the highest values for both metrics. By comparing the predicted probabilities across different models and damage states, the Extreme Gradient Boosting and Category Boosting models provided the best predictive performance, with mean absolute errors of 4.18 and 3.77, and mean squared errors of 27.83 and 23.75, respectively. An analysis of input variable importance using the Extreme Gradient Boosting model revealed that the beam stiffener length-to-thickness ratio was the most significant factor influencing post-fire seismic damage prediction, with an importance coefficient of 24.3 %. This was followed by the beam height-to-thickness ratio (19.9 %) and the beam width-to-thickness ratio (17.5 %). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the Extreme Gradient Boosting model in predicting seismic damage states and provide valuable insights into the key factors affecting the post-fire performance of extended end-plate high-strength steel beam-column connections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 120190"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005814","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To achieve accurate and rapid assessment of the seismic damage state of extended end-plate high-strength steel beam-column connections after fire, this study utilizes seven parameters as input variables: column width-to-thickness ratio, column height-to-thickness ratio, beam width-to-thickness ratio, beam height-to-thickness ratio, beam stiffener length-to-thickness ratio, temperature-induced damage, and seismic intensity levels. The output variable is the damage state of the connections under seismic loading after fire. Eight machine learning models were employed: Category Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbors, Artificial Neural Network, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. The results demonstrate that the Extreme Gradient Boosting model achieved the highest prediction accuracy (0.9) on the test set, followed by the Artificial Neural Network model (0.79). Among the models, the Decision Tree, Category Boosting, Artificial Neural Network, and Extreme Gradient Boosting models exhibited high recall and precision, with the Extreme Gradient Boosting model achieving the highest values for both metrics. By comparing the predicted probabilities across different models and damage states, the Extreme Gradient Boosting and Category Boosting models provided the best predictive performance, with mean absolute errors of 4.18 and 3.77, and mean squared errors of 27.83 and 23.75, respectively. An analysis of input variable importance using the Extreme Gradient Boosting model revealed that the beam stiffener length-to-thickness ratio was the most significant factor influencing post-fire seismic damage prediction, with an importance coefficient of 24.3 %. This was followed by the beam height-to-thickness ratio (19.9 %) and the beam width-to-thickness ratio (17.5 %). These findings highlight the effectiveness of the Extreme Gradient Boosting model in predicting seismic damage states and provide valuable insights into the key factors affecting the post-fire performance of extended end-plate high-strength steel beam-column connections.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信