{"title":"Recommended concrete damage plasticity parameters and constitutive models for UHPC in ABAQUS","authors":"Mina Fakeh , Akram Jawdhari , Amir Fam","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, the concrete damage plasticity (CDP) model of finite element (FE) software ABAQUS is validated and calibrated for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), for the first time. The CDP model is widely used for nonlinear FE analysis and was derived exclusively for normal strength concrete (NSC), hence the need for the current investigation. Inverse FE analysis at the material level was first performed on compressive UHPC cylinder and direct tension UHPC tests from literature, to evaluate the effects of primary CDP inputs, namely: dilation angle, eccentricity, stress ratio, and UHPC stress-strain (<em>σ</em>-<em>ε</em>) curves for compression and tension. Multiple analytical <em>σ-ε</em> models available for the compressive and tensile behavior of UHPC were evaluated within the framework of CDP and inverse FE analysis and were compared with experimental results. Best performing models including those with modifications proposed in this study were identified and recommended for future FE studies. Due to the UHPC material unique response and strong mesh size dependency, modelling its tensile behavior by a <em>σ</em>-<em>ε</em> approach was deemed inaccurate and thus recommended to be replaced with a stress-crack displacement alternative. A tensile strength-dependent revision term is proposed for the post-peak portion of the tensile stress-crack displacement relationship. A component level FE analysis, conducted on 22 structural members of various types (i.e. beams, slabs, columns), material and geometric characteristics, loading, and boundary conditions, confirmed the accuracy of proposed CDP inputs and the recommended modifications. The study results offer valuable guidance essential for the numerical analysis of UHPC members and structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"333 ","pages":"Article 120154"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625005450","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, the concrete damage plasticity (CDP) model of finite element (FE) software ABAQUS is validated and calibrated for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), for the first time. The CDP model is widely used for nonlinear FE analysis and was derived exclusively for normal strength concrete (NSC), hence the need for the current investigation. Inverse FE analysis at the material level was first performed on compressive UHPC cylinder and direct tension UHPC tests from literature, to evaluate the effects of primary CDP inputs, namely: dilation angle, eccentricity, stress ratio, and UHPC stress-strain (σ-ε) curves for compression and tension. Multiple analytical σ-ε models available for the compressive and tensile behavior of UHPC were evaluated within the framework of CDP and inverse FE analysis and were compared with experimental results. Best performing models including those with modifications proposed in this study were identified and recommended for future FE studies. Due to the UHPC material unique response and strong mesh size dependency, modelling its tensile behavior by a σ-ε approach was deemed inaccurate and thus recommended to be replaced with a stress-crack displacement alternative. A tensile strength-dependent revision term is proposed for the post-peak portion of the tensile stress-crack displacement relationship. A component level FE analysis, conducted on 22 structural members of various types (i.e. beams, slabs, columns), material and geometric characteristics, loading, and boundary conditions, confirmed the accuracy of proposed CDP inputs and the recommended modifications. The study results offer valuable guidance essential for the numerical analysis of UHPC members and structures.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.