Leveraging novel machine learning models in predicting groundwater irrigation suitability in southeastern Nigeria: A hydrogeochemical approach

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Obinna Chigoziem Akakuru , Patrick Alexander Ray , Soltanian Mohamad Reza , Emile Temgoua , Moses Oghenenyoreme Eyankware , Godwin O. Aigbadon , Chukwudi Paul Obite , Thomas J. Algeo , Adedibu Sunny Akingboye
{"title":"Leveraging novel machine learning models in predicting groundwater irrigation suitability in southeastern Nigeria: A hydrogeochemical approach","authors":"Obinna Chigoziem Akakuru ,&nbsp;Patrick Alexander Ray ,&nbsp;Soltanian Mohamad Reza ,&nbsp;Emile Temgoua ,&nbsp;Moses Oghenenyoreme Eyankware ,&nbsp;Godwin O. Aigbadon ,&nbsp;Chukwudi Paul Obite ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Algeo ,&nbsp;Adedibu Sunny Akingboye","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Groundwater suitability for irrigation is a crucial component of sustainable agriculture, particularly in regions like Obosi, southeastern Nigeria, where freshwater resources are limited and agricultural demands are high. Despite growing interest in improving prediction models for groundwater suitability, there remains a gap in employing advanced machine learning techniques alongside hydrogeochemical analysis for precise and reliable assessments. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the performance of six novel machine learning models—Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), CatBoost (CatB), AdaBoost (AB), and Gradient Boosting (GB)—in predicting irrigation suitability using 42 groundwater samples. The hydrogeochemical approach in this study employs Piper, Durov, and Schöller plots to analyze groundwater composition and geochemical processes. The findings reveal a sodium chloride (NaCl)-dominated water type, influenced by dissolution, mixing, and reverse ion exchange, with implications for water quality and management. The physicochemical analysis showed pH values ranging from 4.49 to 6.29, electrical conductivity (EC) between 8.16 and 101.7 µS/cm, and chloride concentrations from 8.43 to 32.65 mg/L. All measured parameters fell within permissible limits. However, irrigation indices such as sodium absorption ratio (SAR), sodium percentage (Na%), Kelly's ratio (KR), soluble sodium percentage (SSP), and potential salinity (PS) indicated the groundwater was unsuitable for irrigation. Spatial analysis showed distinct regional patterns, with SAR, Na%, and KR aligning NE–SW, while PS followed a S–N direction. Hydrogeochemical trends revealed Cl⁻ dominance in 71% of samples, with evidence of dissolution, ion exchange, and mixing processes. Principal component analysis highlighted complex inter-parameter relationships, with pH and EC explaining 14.94% of variance. ANN and RF consistently outperformed other models across multiple metrics, which include RMSE, MAPE, R<sup>2</sup>, adjusted R<sup>2</sup>, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), demonstrating strong predictive accuracy and generalization. By contrast, SVM, CatB, AB, and GB exhibited weaker performance and susceptibility to overfitting. This study underscores the potential of ANN and RF for reliable groundwater irrigation suitability assessments. Their integration with hydrogeochemical analysis offers a scalable, cost-effective approach applicable in similar regions globally, enabling enhanced precision in agricultural water management. The findings provide a scientific basis for policymakers, farmers, and water resource managers to implement targeted groundwater management strategies, ensuring sustainable irrigation practices. By integrating advanced machine learning with hydrogeochemical analysis, this study offers a cost-effective and scalable approach for assessing water suitability, which can be applied to similar agricultural regions worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e02646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625001164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater suitability for irrigation is a crucial component of sustainable agriculture, particularly in regions like Obosi, southeastern Nigeria, where freshwater resources are limited and agricultural demands are high. Despite growing interest in improving prediction models for groundwater suitability, there remains a gap in employing advanced machine learning techniques alongside hydrogeochemical analysis for precise and reliable assessments. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the performance of six novel machine learning models—Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), CatBoost (CatB), AdaBoost (AB), and Gradient Boosting (GB)—in predicting irrigation suitability using 42 groundwater samples. The hydrogeochemical approach in this study employs Piper, Durov, and Schöller plots to analyze groundwater composition and geochemical processes. The findings reveal a sodium chloride (NaCl)-dominated water type, influenced by dissolution, mixing, and reverse ion exchange, with implications for water quality and management. The physicochemical analysis showed pH values ranging from 4.49 to 6.29, electrical conductivity (EC) between 8.16 and 101.7 µS/cm, and chloride concentrations from 8.43 to 32.65 mg/L. All measured parameters fell within permissible limits. However, irrigation indices such as sodium absorption ratio (SAR), sodium percentage (Na%), Kelly's ratio (KR), soluble sodium percentage (SSP), and potential salinity (PS) indicated the groundwater was unsuitable for irrigation. Spatial analysis showed distinct regional patterns, with SAR, Na%, and KR aligning NE–SW, while PS followed a S–N direction. Hydrogeochemical trends revealed Cl⁻ dominance in 71% of samples, with evidence of dissolution, ion exchange, and mixing processes. Principal component analysis highlighted complex inter-parameter relationships, with pH and EC explaining 14.94% of variance. ANN and RF consistently outperformed other models across multiple metrics, which include RMSE, MAPE, R2, adjusted R2, Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), demonstrating strong predictive accuracy and generalization. By contrast, SVM, CatB, AB, and GB exhibited weaker performance and susceptibility to overfitting. This study underscores the potential of ANN and RF for reliable groundwater irrigation suitability assessments. Their integration with hydrogeochemical analysis offers a scalable, cost-effective approach applicable in similar regions globally, enabling enhanced precision in agricultural water management. The findings provide a scientific basis for policymakers, farmers, and water resource managers to implement targeted groundwater management strategies, ensuring sustainable irrigation practices. By integrating advanced machine learning with hydrogeochemical analysis, this study offers a cost-effective and scalable approach for assessing water suitability, which can be applied to similar agricultural regions worldwide.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信