A CFD study of the unsteady leakage and dispersion of natural gas pipelines containing high-H2S in mountainous terrain

IF 6.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Jie Wang , Changjun Li , Chao Chen , Wenlong Jia , Yuhan Liu , Ke Wang , Guiliang Li
{"title":"A CFD study of the unsteady leakage and dispersion of natural gas pipelines containing high-H2S in mountainous terrain","authors":"Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Changjun Li ,&nbsp;Chao Chen ,&nbsp;Wenlong Jia ,&nbsp;Yuhan Liu ,&nbsp;Ke Wang ,&nbsp;Guiliang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.106981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The leakage and diffusion of high-H<sub>2</sub>S natural gas pipelines in complex terrain poses significant toxic risks. Previous studies often assumed uniform gas diffusion coefficients and mass flow rates, leading to substantial errors in energy and mass flux calculations, and ultimately, inaccurate assessments of leakage impact and hazard levels. This study corrects the multicomponent gas diffusion coefficient matrix, reducing errors to 5.14 %, and then derived the unsteady mass flow rate through small pipeline leaks, applying these to the flow governing equations. Results show that the effect of wind speed on toxic gas diffusion in small or 2D calculations does not apply to actual 3D conditions. The H<sub>2</sub>S SCC (Safety Critical Concentration) range far exceeds methane’s LEL (Lower Explosion Limited) range, highlighting the importance of H<sub>2</sub>S toxicity in the incidents. The leakage direction and range are mainly influenced by Fick coefficient, unsteady state mass flow rate, complex terrain, and wind field. Close to the leakage hole, jet effects dominate gas distribution, while farther away, diffusion from concentration gradients prevails. Quantitative analysis shows that H<sub>2</sub>S concentration initially rises then falls due to transient mass flow rate. While increases in initial pressure <em>P</em><sub>0</sub>, leakage diameter <em>D</em><sub>leak</sub>, and H<sub>2</sub>S content <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> all expand the diffusion range, <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> has the least impact. The exponential effect of <em>D</em><sub>leak</sub> on leakage time means smaller hole may lead to a larger H<sub>2</sub>S SCC range. Therefore, the condition of living organisms at a specific point, will be suffered more hazardous condition when the HSGTP has a higher <em>P</em><sub>0</sub> or <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mi>S</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>, and the larger <em>D</em><sub>leak</sub> may have the opposite effect. Higher wind speed <em>u</em><sub><em>wind</em></sub> shift the diffusion range from the vertical to the radial direction, while wind direction changes are significantly influenced by terrain barriers. Trees, acting as obstacles, significantly hinder gas diffusion due to the severe kinetic energy loss of the process. These findings provide significant insights for safety insights in future incidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 106981"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025002484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The leakage and diffusion of high-H2S natural gas pipelines in complex terrain poses significant toxic risks. Previous studies often assumed uniform gas diffusion coefficients and mass flow rates, leading to substantial errors in energy and mass flux calculations, and ultimately, inaccurate assessments of leakage impact and hazard levels. This study corrects the multicomponent gas diffusion coefficient matrix, reducing errors to 5.14 %, and then derived the unsteady mass flow rate through small pipeline leaks, applying these to the flow governing equations. Results show that the effect of wind speed on toxic gas diffusion in small or 2D calculations does not apply to actual 3D conditions. The H2S SCC (Safety Critical Concentration) range far exceeds methane’s LEL (Lower Explosion Limited) range, highlighting the importance of H2S toxicity in the incidents. The leakage direction and range are mainly influenced by Fick coefficient, unsteady state mass flow rate, complex terrain, and wind field. Close to the leakage hole, jet effects dominate gas distribution, while farther away, diffusion from concentration gradients prevails. Quantitative analysis shows that H2S concentration initially rises then falls due to transient mass flow rate. While increases in initial pressure P0, leakage diameter Dleak, and H2S content xH2S all expand the diffusion range, xH2S has the least impact. The exponential effect of Dleak on leakage time means smaller hole may lead to a larger H2S SCC range. Therefore, the condition of living organisms at a specific point, will be suffered more hazardous condition when the HSGTP has a higher P0 or xH2S, and the larger Dleak may have the opposite effect. Higher wind speed uwind shift the diffusion range from the vertical to the radial direction, while wind direction changes are significantly influenced by terrain barriers. Trees, acting as obstacles, significantly hinder gas diffusion due to the severe kinetic energy loss of the process. These findings provide significant insights for safety insights in future incidents.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信