Prognostic value of the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tianxin Long MD, PhD , Yu Yu MD, PhD , Sijing Cheng MD, PhD, Hao Huang MD, PhD, Wei Hua MD, PhD, FHRS
{"title":"Prognostic value of the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy","authors":"Tianxin Long MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu Yu MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sijing Cheng MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hao Huang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Wei Hua MD, PhD, FHRS","doi":"10.1016/j.hroo.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hepatorenal dysfunction is prevalent among individuals with heart failure (HF).</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study investigated prognostic value of the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio [MELD-XI] scores and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with albumin replacing international normalized ratio [MELD-Albumin]) score in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively evaluated 365 patients (mean age 58.7 ± 11.1 years; 64.9% men) undergoing CRT implantation between 2007 and 2019. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the modified MELD score quartiles before CRT. The primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, whereas the secondary endpoint was CRT response at 6 months.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During mean follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.9–5.2 years), 168 patients reached the primary endpoint. Logistic regression revealed the MELD-Albumin score was independently associated with CRT response, even after adjusting for covariates (odds ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.19; <em>P</em> = .013). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with a higher MELD-XI and MELD-Albumin score had a greater risk of adverse outcomes (log-rank test: <em>P &lt;</em> .001). A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the modified MELD score remained significantly associated with adverse outcomes after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic factors (MELD-XI: hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, <em>P =</em> .006; MELD-Albumin: hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.16, <em>P &lt;</em> .001). Furthermore, receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that the MELD-Albumin score provided a stronger prognostic value for long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing CRT than the MELD-XI score (MELD-Albumin: area under the curve 0.692, 95% CI 0.644–0.742; MELD-XI: area under the curve 0.659, 95% CI 0.608–0.715; <em>P =</em> .008).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The MELD-Albumin score may be useful for stratifying patients at risk for CRT response and adverse outcomes in those undergoing CRT for HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29772,"journal":{"name":"Heart Rhythm O2","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 339-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Rhythm O2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666501825000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hepatorenal dysfunction is prevalent among individuals with heart failure (HF).

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated prognostic value of the modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio [MELD-XI] scores and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with albumin replacing international normalized ratio [MELD-Albumin]) score in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 365 patients (mean age 58.7 ± 11.1 years; 64.9% men) undergoing CRT implantation between 2007 and 2019. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the modified MELD score quartiles before CRT. The primary endpoint was the combination of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, whereas the secondary endpoint was CRT response at 6 months.

Results

During mean follow-up of 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.9–5.2 years), 168 patients reached the primary endpoint. Logistic regression revealed the MELD-Albumin score was independently associated with CRT response, even after adjusting for covariates (odds ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.19; P = .013). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with a higher MELD-XI and MELD-Albumin score had a greater risk of adverse outcomes (log-rank test: P < .001). A Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the modified MELD score remained significantly associated with adverse outcomes after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic factors (MELD-XI: hazard ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.11, P = .006; MELD-Albumin: hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.16, P < .001). Furthermore, receiver-operating characteristic analysis indicated that the MELD-Albumin score provided a stronger prognostic value for long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing CRT than the MELD-XI score (MELD-Albumin: area under the curve 0.692, 95% CI 0.644–0.742; MELD-XI: area under the curve 0.659, 95% CI 0.608–0.715; P = .008).

Conclusion

The MELD-Albumin score may be useful for stratifying patients at risk for CRT response and adverse outcomes in those undergoing CRT for HF.
改良终末期肝病模型评分在心脏再同步化治疗患者中的预后价值
背景:肝肾功能障碍在心力衰竭(HF)患者中普遍存在。目的:本研究探讨改良终末期肝病模型(不包括国际标准化比值[MELD-XI]评分的终末期肝病模型)和白蛋白替代国际标准化比值[MELD-Albumin]评分的终末期肝病模型)在接受心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)患者中的预后价值。方法回顾性分析365例患者(平均年龄58.7±11.1岁;64.9%的男性)在2007年至2019年期间接受了CRT植入。根据CRT前改良MELD评分四分位数分为4组。主要终点是全因死亡率和HF住院率,而次要终点是6个月时的CRT反应。结果平均随访3.3年(四分位数间隔1.9-5.2年),168例患者达到主要终点。逻辑回归显示meld -白蛋白评分与CRT疗效独立相关,即使在调整协变量后也是如此(优势比1.10;95%置信区间[CI] 1.02-1.19;P = .013)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,MELD-XI和MELD-Albumin评分较高的患者发生不良结局的风险更高(log-rank检验:P <;措施)。Cox比例风险分析显示,在调整临床和超声心动图因素后,修改后的MELD评分仍与不良结局显著相关(MELD- xi:风险比1.06,95% CI 1.02-1.11, P = 0.006;MELD-Albumin:风险比1.10,95% CI 1.05-1.16, P <;措施)。此外,接受者操作特征分析表明,MELD-Albumin评分比MELD-XI评分(MELD-Albumin:曲线下面积0.692,95% CI 0.644-0.742;MELD-XI:曲线下面积0.659,95% CI 0.608-0.715;P = .008)。结论meld -白蛋白评分可能有助于对心衰患者进行CRT反应风险和不良结局风险的分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Rhythm O2
Heart Rhythm O2 Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信