Surprisingly popular-based multivariate conceptual knowledge acquisition method

IF 3.2 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Xianwei Xin , Shiting Yuan , Tao Li , Zhanao Xue , Chenyang Wang
{"title":"Surprisingly popular-based multivariate conceptual knowledge acquisition method","authors":"Xianwei Xin ,&nbsp;Shiting Yuan ,&nbsp;Tao Li ,&nbsp;Zhanao Xue ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) plays a crucial role in uncertain artificial intelligence by revealing specialization and generalization relationships among concepts. Unlike artificial neural network methods, concepts are fundamental to human cognition and learning, making knowledge acquisition and decision-making methods highly significant, especially when influenced by data and cognition. However, existing FCA models and extensions predominantly emphasize data-driven approaches, often disregarding the cognitive attributes of individual learners. This paper introduces a novel method for acquiring diverse conceptual knowledge and a cognition-enhanced decision-making approach based on the Surprisingly Popular (SP) method. Initially, it defines a new multivariate relational formal context and its corresponding decision-making method to facilitate a more sophisticated exploration of uncertain information. Additionally, it presents a method for quantifying the similarity of multivariate concepts. The SP approach is then integrated to identify the core and peripheral multivariate concepts within the multivariate concept lattice. Furthermore, the paper develops a multivariate cognitive decision-making method and presents the corresponding algorithm. Finally, instance analysis is conducted on the UCI dataset to compare the proposed method with state-of-the-art models. The results indicate that the proposed model effectively uncovers core and peripheral concepts within uncertain information by incorporating human cognitive decision processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 109419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X2500060X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) plays a crucial role in uncertain artificial intelligence by revealing specialization and generalization relationships among concepts. Unlike artificial neural network methods, concepts are fundamental to human cognition and learning, making knowledge acquisition and decision-making methods highly significant, especially when influenced by data and cognition. However, existing FCA models and extensions predominantly emphasize data-driven approaches, often disregarding the cognitive attributes of individual learners. This paper introduces a novel method for acquiring diverse conceptual knowledge and a cognition-enhanced decision-making approach based on the Surprisingly Popular (SP) method. Initially, it defines a new multivariate relational formal context and its corresponding decision-making method to facilitate a more sophisticated exploration of uncertain information. Additionally, it presents a method for quantifying the similarity of multivariate concepts. The SP approach is then integrated to identify the core and peripheral multivariate concepts within the multivariate concept lattice. Furthermore, the paper develops a multivariate cognitive decision-making method and presents the corresponding algorithm. Finally, instance analysis is conducted on the UCI dataset to compare the proposed method with state-of-the-art models. The results indicate that the proposed model effectively uncovers core and peripheral concepts within uncertain information by incorporating human cognitive decision processes.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
170
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning. Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信