Risk of distant metastasis after local excision for near-complete response versus salvage surgery for local regrowth in rectal cancer: Results from an international registry

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109761
Constance Jehaes , Yves Panis , Laura Fernandez , Bernard Lelong , Guilherme Sao Julião , Bruna Vailati , Jeremie H. Lefevre , Jean-Jacques Tuech , José Azevedo , Stéphane Benoist , Amjad Parvaiz , Mege Diane , Angelita Habr- Gama , Rodrigo Perez , Quentin Denost , GRECCAR Group
{"title":"Risk of distant metastasis after local excision for near-complete response versus salvage surgery for local regrowth in rectal cancer: Results from an international registry","authors":"Constance Jehaes ,&nbsp;Yves Panis ,&nbsp;Laura Fernandez ,&nbsp;Bernard Lelong ,&nbsp;Guilherme Sao Julião ,&nbsp;Bruna Vailati ,&nbsp;Jeremie H. Lefevre ,&nbsp;Jean-Jacques Tuech ,&nbsp;José Azevedo ,&nbsp;Stéphane Benoist ,&nbsp;Amjad Parvaiz ,&nbsp;Mege Diane ,&nbsp;Angelita Habr- Gama ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Perez ,&nbsp;Quentin Denost ,&nbsp;GRECCAR Group","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Watch and Wait (WW) strategy is currently used for mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Local regrowth (LR) is a well-known risk, but its impact on distant metastasis (DM) is increasingly debated. This study aimed to assess the rate of DM after local excision (LE) for near-complete clinical response (ncCR) at restaging versus salvage surgery for regrowth following WW.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Retrospective analysis of DM rates from a prospective international registry, comparing patients with ncCR after NAT who underwent LE and patients with initial complete clinical response (cCR) and WW strategy, who underwent salvage surgery for regrowth. The primary endpoint was the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (5y-DMFS). Univariate/Multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors of DM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 138 patients included, 59 had LE for ncCR and 79 had salvage surgery after regrowth including TME (n = 23), APR (n = 30) and LE (n = 26). The 5y-DMFS was lower in patients with surgery at regrowth, 71 % <em>vs.</em> 93 % (p = 0.006). LR was the only independent risk factor associated with DM (OR:3.89; 95 % CI:1.34–11.25; p = 0.012). When only patients managed by salvage LE for LR are considered, 5y-DMFS was equivalent to LE at restaging (87 <em>vs.</em> 93; p = 0.442).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with rectal cancer undergoing LE for ncCR after NAT have a significantly lower rate of DM compared to patients undergoing salvage surgery after LR within WW approach. Patients managed by LE for regrowth may represent a distinct subgroup where the risk of subsequent DM is equivalent to patients managed by LE at restage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 7","pages":"Article 109761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325001891","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Watch and Wait (WW) strategy is currently used for mid/low rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT). Local regrowth (LR) is a well-known risk, but its impact on distant metastasis (DM) is increasingly debated. This study aimed to assess the rate of DM after local excision (LE) for near-complete clinical response (ncCR) at restaging versus salvage surgery for regrowth following WW.

Method

Retrospective analysis of DM rates from a prospective international registry, comparing patients with ncCR after NAT who underwent LE and patients with initial complete clinical response (cCR) and WW strategy, who underwent salvage surgery for regrowth. The primary endpoint was the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (5y-DMFS). Univariate/Multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors of DM.

Results

Among 138 patients included, 59 had LE for ncCR and 79 had salvage surgery after regrowth including TME (n = 23), APR (n = 30) and LE (n = 26). The 5y-DMFS was lower in patients with surgery at regrowth, 71 % vs. 93 % (p = 0.006). LR was the only independent risk factor associated with DM (OR:3.89; 95 % CI:1.34–11.25; p = 0.012). When only patients managed by salvage LE for LR are considered, 5y-DMFS was equivalent to LE at restaging (87 vs. 93; p = 0.442).

Conclusion

Patients with rectal cancer undergoing LE for ncCR after NAT have a significantly lower rate of DM compared to patients undergoing salvage surgery after LR within WW approach. Patients managed by LE for regrowth may represent a distinct subgroup where the risk of subsequent DM is equivalent to patients managed by LE at restage.
观察和等待(WW)策略目前用于新辅助治疗(NAT)后的中/低位直肠腺癌。局部生长(LR)是一个众所周知的风险,但其对远处转移(DM)的影响却引起了越来越多的争论。本研究旨在评估在重新分期时因接近完全临床反应(ncCR)而进行局部切除(LE)后的DM发生率与因WW后再生而进行挽救手术后的DM发生率。方法对前瞻性国际登记处的DM发生率进行回顾性分析,比较接受LE的NAT后ncCR患者与接受挽救手术治疗再生的初始完全临床反应(cCR)和WW策略患者。主要终点是5年无远处转移生存率(5y-DMFS)。结果138例患者中,59例因ncCR接受了LE手术,79例在再生后接受了挽救手术,包括TME(23例)、APR(30例)和LE(26例)。在再生时进行手术的患者的 5y-DMFS 较低,为 71% 对 93%(p = 0.006)。LR是唯一与DM相关的独立风险因素(OR:3.89; 95 % CI:1.34-11.25; p = 0.012)。结论NAT后接受LE治疗ncCR的直肠癌患者与WW方法中LR后接受挽救手术的患者相比,DM发生率明显较低。接受LE治疗再生的患者可能代表了一个独特的亚组,其后续DM的风险与接受LE治疗复位的患者相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信