Carbon and water footprints within an environmental laboratory: Water, energy, and packaging management strategies

María F. Manobanda-Lisintuña , Cristina A. Villamar-Ayala
{"title":"Carbon and water footprints within an environmental laboratory: Water, energy, and packaging management strategies","authors":"María F. Manobanda-Lisintuña ,&nbsp;Cristina A. Villamar-Ayala","doi":"10.1016/j.greeac.2025.100243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental laboratories can be spaces where water, energy, and resources can be used more efficiently. The objective of this study is to evaluate the carbon and water footprints present in an environmental laboratory based on water, energy, and resource (packaging) management. To achieve this, life cycle analysis is applied (ISO 14040:2006, ISO 14044:2007) to 17 assay water (natural water/wastewater) types from an accredited environmental laboratory (ISO/IEC 17025). System boundaries correspond to cradle to gate, and 1 analyzed water sample is used as a functional unit. This study evaluates several factors baseline scenario, energy consumption reduction, 100 % renewable energy matrix, and material consumption reduction. Results show that under normal conditions the laboratory generated a carbon footprint of 10.10 kg CO2-eq/sample (82 % energy used), and a water footprint of 11.76 m3/sample (97 % indirect water). A 100 % renewable energy matrix improved laboratory environmental performance (75 % reduction carbon footprint), decreasing emissions up to 12 times (1,583 kg CO2-eq/year). Meanwhile, material consumption reduction considering the laboratory accreditation (i.e. smaller glass containers) improved the laboratory environmental performance (up to 6 % reduced water footprint), reducing direct water consumption up to 0.3 %. Although costs are not significantly affected by these scenarios, savings in energy consumption based on phantom power in equipment (which can be disconnected) can reduce the cost per water sample analyzed by 7.8 % (83 USD/year). The water and carbon footprint measuring in accredited environmental laboratories opens opportunities for the incorporation of different strategies that incorporate sustainability, and not only analytical quality (ISO 17025).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100594,"journal":{"name":"Green Analytical Chemistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental laboratories can be spaces where water, energy, and resources can be used more efficiently. The objective of this study is to evaluate the carbon and water footprints present in an environmental laboratory based on water, energy, and resource (packaging) management. To achieve this, life cycle analysis is applied (ISO 14040:2006, ISO 14044:2007) to 17 assay water (natural water/wastewater) types from an accredited environmental laboratory (ISO/IEC 17025). System boundaries correspond to cradle to gate, and 1 analyzed water sample is used as a functional unit. This study evaluates several factors baseline scenario, energy consumption reduction, 100 % renewable energy matrix, and material consumption reduction. Results show that under normal conditions the laboratory generated a carbon footprint of 10.10 kg CO2-eq/sample (82 % energy used), and a water footprint of 11.76 m3/sample (97 % indirect water). A 100 % renewable energy matrix improved laboratory environmental performance (75 % reduction carbon footprint), decreasing emissions up to 12 times (1,583 kg CO2-eq/year). Meanwhile, material consumption reduction considering the laboratory accreditation (i.e. smaller glass containers) improved the laboratory environmental performance (up to 6 % reduced water footprint), reducing direct water consumption up to 0.3 %. Although costs are not significantly affected by these scenarios, savings in energy consumption based on phantom power in equipment (which can be disconnected) can reduce the cost per water sample analyzed by 7.8 % (83 USD/year). The water and carbon footprint measuring in accredited environmental laboratories opens opportunities for the incorporation of different strategies that incorporate sustainability, and not only analytical quality (ISO 17025).

Abstract Image

环境实验室是可以更有效地利用水、能源和资源的空间。本研究的目的是根据水、能源和资源(包装)管理,评估环境实验室的碳足迹和水足迹。为此,采用生命周期分析法(ISO 14040:2006、ISO 14044:2007)对一家获得认证的环境实验室(ISO/IEC 17025)的 17 种化验用水(天然水/废水)进行分析。系统边界与 "从摇篮到大门 "相对应,1 个分析水样作为一个功能单元。本研究对基线方案、降低能耗、100% 可再生能源矩阵和降低材料消耗等因素进行了评估。结果表明,在正常条件下,实验室产生的碳足迹为 10.10 千克二氧化碳当量/样品(82%为能源消耗),水足迹为 11.76 立方米/样品(97%为间接用水)。100% 的可再生能源矩阵提高了实验室的环保性能(碳足迹减少 75%),排放量减少达 12 倍(1,583 千克二氧化碳当量/年)。同时,考虑到实验室认证(即使用更小的玻璃容器),减少材料消耗也提高了实验室的环保性能(水足迹减少达 6%),直接用水量减少达 0.3%。尽管这些方案对成本的影响不大,但基于设备中的幻象电源(可断开)而节省的能耗可使每个水样的分析成本降低 7.8 %(83 美元/年)。在通过认证的环境实验室中测量水足迹和碳足迹,不仅可以提高分析质量(ISO 17025),还可以采用不同的可持续发展战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信