Nitrogen and hydrogen as alternatives to helium using wide-bore columns in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography

Lorenzo Cucinotta , Elisa Irrera , Francesca Cannizzaro , Danilo Sciarrone , Luigi Mondello
{"title":"Nitrogen and hydrogen as alternatives to helium using wide-bore columns in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography","authors":"Lorenzo Cucinotta ,&nbsp;Elisa Irrera ,&nbsp;Francesca Cannizzaro ,&nbsp;Danilo Sciarrone ,&nbsp;Luigi Mondello","doi":"10.1016/j.greeac.2025.100255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wide-bore capillary columns (0.53 mm I.D.) are frequently employed in preparative gas chromatography due to their enhanced sample capacity than the micro-bore counterparts. However, the increased carrier gas flow rates required, especially in multidimensional separations, leads to elevated consumption. Helium is the most used carrier gas thanks to its superior chromatographic performance and inertness, which mitigates safety concerns in routine use. However, helium has experienced supply shortages and rising costs in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate more sustainable carrier gases than helium in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography. In the first stage, the chromatographic performance of nitrogen, hydrogen, and helium was compared on columns equipped with diverse stationary phases using GC-FID. In the second step, the performances of hydrogen and nitrogen were benchmarked against helium in a prototype preparative multidimensional gas chromatographic system. A lemon essential oil was utilized to assess the impact of these carrier gases. Despite a minor variation in terms of total analysis time, comparable chromatographic profiles were achieved with each carrier gas. Our findings indicate that hydrogen and nitrogen, particularly the latter owing to its inherent inertness and safety profile, can represent viable alternatives to helium in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography. These gases offer comparable chromatographic performance while addressing the helium's increasing costs and supply constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100594,"journal":{"name":"Green Analytical Chemistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772577425000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wide-bore capillary columns (0.53 mm I.D.) are frequently employed in preparative gas chromatography due to their enhanced sample capacity than the micro-bore counterparts. However, the increased carrier gas flow rates required, especially in multidimensional separations, leads to elevated consumption. Helium is the most used carrier gas thanks to its superior chromatographic performance and inertness, which mitigates safety concerns in routine use. However, helium has experienced supply shortages and rising costs in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate more sustainable carrier gases than helium in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography. In the first stage, the chromatographic performance of nitrogen, hydrogen, and helium was compared on columns equipped with diverse stationary phases using GC-FID. In the second step, the performances of hydrogen and nitrogen were benchmarked against helium in a prototype preparative multidimensional gas chromatographic system. A lemon essential oil was utilized to assess the impact of these carrier gases. Despite a minor variation in terms of total analysis time, comparable chromatographic profiles were achieved with each carrier gas. Our findings indicate that hydrogen and nitrogen, particularly the latter owing to its inherent inertness and safety profile, can represent viable alternatives to helium in preparative multidimensional gas chromatography. These gases offer comparable chromatographic performance while addressing the helium's increasing costs and supply constraints.
宽孔毛细管柱(内径 0.53 毫米)比微孔毛细管柱的样品容量更大,因此在制备气相色谱中经常使用。然而,由于所需的载气流速增加,特别是在多维分离中,导致消耗量增加。氦气是最常用的载气,因为它具有卓越的色谱性能和惰性,可减轻日常使用中的安全问题。然而,近年来氦气出现了供应短缺和成本上升的问题。本研究旨在评估制备型多维气相色谱中比氦气更可持续的载气。第一阶段,使用 GC-FID 在配备不同固定相的色谱柱上比较氮气、氢气和氦气的色谱性能。第二步,在原型制备型多维气相色谱系统中,将氢气和氮气的性能与氦气进行比较。利用柠檬精油来评估这些载气的影响。尽管在总分析时间上略有不同,但每种载气都能获得相似的色谱图。我们的研究结果表明,在制备型多维气相色谱中,氢气和氮气(尤其是氮气,因其固有的惰性和安全性)可作为氦气的可行替代品。这些气体在解决氦气日益增长的成本和供应限制问题的同时,还能提供相当的色谱性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信