Comparative analysis of a conventional cantilever abutment and innovative double abutment in dental implant prosthesis: A finite element analysis study

Luciana Silva Colepícolo , Paulo Henrique Vieira Magalhães , Maria Auxiliadora Mourão Martinez , Luís Otávio Miranda Cota , Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima , Lucas Fernandes Sousa Pessoa , Guilherme Augusto Oliveira , Fernando Oliveira Costa
{"title":"Comparative analysis of a conventional cantilever abutment and innovative double abutment in dental implant prosthesis: A finite element analysis study","authors":"Luciana Silva Colepícolo ,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Vieira Magalhães ,&nbsp;Maria Auxiliadora Mourão Martinez ,&nbsp;Luís Otávio Miranda Cota ,&nbsp;Rafael Paschoal Esteves Lima ,&nbsp;Lucas Fernandes Sousa Pessoa ,&nbsp;Guilherme Augusto Oliveira ,&nbsp;Fernando Oliveira Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.bea.2025.100151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The innovative double paraboloid abutment (DA) in dental implant prosthesis is based on the new concept of Biodynamic Optimized Peri-implant Tissue (BOiT) and was introduced in a human case series report with follow-ups ranging from 3 to 12 years. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of two structural designs: the innovative DA and a distal conventional cantilever (CC) in fixed prostheses retained by a single dental implant. The evaluation focused on stress and strain distributions in bone tissue (cortical and medullary), as well as stress distribution in the abutments, UCLA, implants, and retaining screws under axial and oblique loading, using 3D finite element analysis. Each model consisted of a bone block representing the area from the right second premolar to the first molar, with one internal hexagon implant (4.0 × 10 mm) supporting a fixed dental prosthesis of two elements. Forces of 100 N were applied in both axial and oblique directions (at 30° in the Y direction). The von Mises criterion was used to assess maximum principal stress values and microstrain. Simulations were created using ANSYS mechanical software. After applying the loads and obtaining the stress results, using the same materials for each of the modeled parts, as well as bone and identical loads, it was observed that the DA design yielded more favorable results than the cantilever. The DA showed significantly lower stress levels and better strain distributions, indicating a more favorable biomechanical interaction between structures. These findings suggest that DA designs may reduce stress concentrations and potentially minimize the risk of clinical complications compared to traditional CC designs, leading to improved long-term implant stability and success rates in patients missing two adjacent dental elements, supported by a single osseointegrated implant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72384,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical engineering advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical engineering advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667099225000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The innovative double paraboloid abutment (DA) in dental implant prosthesis is based on the new concept of Biodynamic Optimized Peri-implant Tissue (BOiT) and was introduced in a human case series report with follow-ups ranging from 3 to 12 years. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of two structural designs: the innovative DA and a distal conventional cantilever (CC) in fixed prostheses retained by a single dental implant. The evaluation focused on stress and strain distributions in bone tissue (cortical and medullary), as well as stress distribution in the abutments, UCLA, implants, and retaining screws under axial and oblique loading, using 3D finite element analysis. Each model consisted of a bone block representing the area from the right second premolar to the first molar, with one internal hexagon implant (4.0 × 10 mm) supporting a fixed dental prosthesis of two elements. Forces of 100 N were applied in both axial and oblique directions (at 30° in the Y direction). The von Mises criterion was used to assess maximum principal stress values and microstrain. Simulations were created using ANSYS mechanical software. After applying the loads and obtaining the stress results, using the same materials for each of the modeled parts, as well as bone and identical loads, it was observed that the DA design yielded more favorable results than the cantilever. The DA showed significantly lower stress levels and better strain distributions, indicating a more favorable biomechanical interaction between structures. These findings suggest that DA designs may reduce stress concentrations and potentially minimize the risk of clinical complications compared to traditional CC designs, leading to improved long-term implant stability and success rates in patients missing two adjacent dental elements, supported by a single osseointegrated implant.
传统悬臂基牙与创新双基牙在种植体修复中的比较分析:有限元分析研究
创新的双抛物面基台(DA)是基于生物动力学优化种植体周围组织(BOiT)的新概念,并在人类病例系列报告中介绍,随访时间从3到12年。本研究旨在评估两种结构设计的影响:创新的DA和远端传统悬臂(CC)在单个种植体保留的固定修复体中。评估主要集中在骨组织(皮质和髓质)的应力和应变分布,以及基台、UCLA、种植体和固定螺钉在轴向和斜向载荷下的应力分布,采用三维有限元分析。每个模型由一个骨块组成,代表从右第二前磨牙到第一磨牙的区域,一个内六边形种植体(4.0 × 10 mm)支持两个固定单元的固定义齿。在轴向和斜向(在Y方向上30°)施加100牛的力。采用von Mises准则评估最大主应力值和微应变。采用ANSYS机械软件进行仿真。在施加载荷并获得应力结果后,对每个建模部件使用相同的材料,以及骨和相同的载荷,可以观察到DA设计比悬臂梁设计产生更有利的结果。DA具有较低的应力水平和较好的应变分布,表明结构间具有较好的生物力学相互作用。这些研究结果表明,与传统的CC设计相比,DA设计可以减少应力集中,潜在地减少临床并发症的风险,从而提高了缺少相邻两个牙元的患者的长期种植稳定性和成功率,并由单个骨整合种植体支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical engineering advances
Biomedical engineering advances Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信