Do natural resources determine Chinese education aid? A subnational analysis of Chinese aid to Africa

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Dickson David Agbaji , Itunu Grace Ishola , Adams Bodomo
{"title":"Do natural resources determine Chinese education aid? A subnational analysis of Chinese aid to Africa","authors":"Dickson David Agbaji ,&nbsp;Itunu Grace Ishola ,&nbsp;Adams Bodomo","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2025.101648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since launching the Forum of China-Africa Cooperation in 2000, China has become Africa's top trading partner and the continent has obtained the largest share of Chinese development aid, including education projects. However, many attribute Chinese aid chiefly to natural resource extraction, oversimplifying the multifaceted nature of Africa-China ties. This study investigates whether and how Africa's natural resources influence Chinese aid allocations, adopting an instrumental variable design relying on the availability of the geospatial and disaggregated information of Chinese projects, oil and gas fields, and mines for 19 African countries. We find that natural resource endowment does not significantly raise the exposure and scale of Chinese education aid commitments in subnational areas. However, our results demonstrate that existing education capacity vis-à-vis the years of schooling and other localized factors like geographic size, population density, capital city, malaria incidence, and prior World Bank aid raise the likelihood of receiving Chinese aid, while higher migration rates significantly decrease it. We argue that China's focus on education development and strategic investments in human capital across Africa may explain these patterns, though a selection bias persists, with aid overlooking remote and impoverished areas, attributable to political considerations on the part of China and beneficiary governments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X25000371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since launching the Forum of China-Africa Cooperation in 2000, China has become Africa's top trading partner and the continent has obtained the largest share of Chinese development aid, including education projects. However, many attribute Chinese aid chiefly to natural resource extraction, oversimplifying the multifaceted nature of Africa-China ties. This study investigates whether and how Africa's natural resources influence Chinese aid allocations, adopting an instrumental variable design relying on the availability of the geospatial and disaggregated information of Chinese projects, oil and gas fields, and mines for 19 African countries. We find that natural resource endowment does not significantly raise the exposure and scale of Chinese education aid commitments in subnational areas. However, our results demonstrate that existing education capacity vis-à-vis the years of schooling and other localized factors like geographic size, population density, capital city, malaria incidence, and prior World Bank aid raise the likelihood of receiving Chinese aid, while higher migration rates significantly decrease it. We argue that China's focus on education development and strategic investments in human capital across Africa may explain these patterns, though a selection bias persists, with aid overlooking remote and impoverished areas, attributable to political considerations on the part of China and beneficiary governments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信