Measuring suicidal behavior in the era of rapid-acting antidepressants: A systematic review of ketamine studies

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Flávia Vieira , Ana Teresa Caliman-Fontes , Breno Souza-Marques , Daniela Faria-Guimarães , Daniel H. Lins-Silva , Cassio Santos-Lima , Ana Paula Jesus-Nunes , Lucas C. Quarantini
{"title":"Measuring suicidal behavior in the era of rapid-acting antidepressants: A systematic review of ketamine studies","authors":"Flávia Vieira ,&nbsp;Ana Teresa Caliman-Fontes ,&nbsp;Breno Souza-Marques ,&nbsp;Daniela Faria-Guimarães ,&nbsp;Daniel H. Lins-Silva ,&nbsp;Cassio Santos-Lima ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Jesus-Nunes ,&nbsp;Lucas C. Quarantini","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment measures for suicidal behavior range from depression scales to longer suicide-specific instruments. In this review, we systematically summarize and discuss the currently used instruments for assessing suicidal behavior in the context of ketamine and its enantiomers. We searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for ketamine (and its enantiomers) human studies exploring this drug's antisuicidal effects on major depressive disorder patients, published from February 2000 to June 2023. Forty-six studies were included, identifying 16 assessment tools, mostly explicit and clinician-rated measures. Prominent tools included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and both the clinician and patient-rated Beck Scales for Suicide Ideation (SSI and BSS). With the exception of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT), to the best of our knowledge, no other instrument that assesses suicidality seems to be specifically developed for measuring treatment response in rapid-acting antidepressants trials. Most scales have been validated in conventional antidepressant or psychotherapy contexts, though, for MADRS, as well as for SSI, BDI, and HAM-D, efforts have been made towards investigating their psychometric properties in the field of rapid-acting antidepressants. The heterogeneity of suicidal behavior assessment in ketamine studies may hinder adequate comparisons between them. Although there does not seem to be a universally preferable instrument for measuring suicidal behavior to date, the MADRS potentially emerges as an adequately recommended choice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"348 ","pages":"Article 116443"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment measures for suicidal behavior range from depression scales to longer suicide-specific instruments. In this review, we systematically summarize and discuss the currently used instruments for assessing suicidal behavior in the context of ketamine and its enantiomers. We searched Medline/PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for ketamine (and its enantiomers) human studies exploring this drug's antisuicidal effects on major depressive disorder patients, published from February 2000 to June 2023. Forty-six studies were included, identifying 16 assessment tools, mostly explicit and clinician-rated measures. Prominent tools included the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and both the clinician and patient-rated Beck Scales for Suicide Ideation (SSI and BSS). With the exception of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Assessment Tool (SIBAT), to the best of our knowledge, no other instrument that assesses suicidality seems to be specifically developed for measuring treatment response in rapid-acting antidepressants trials. Most scales have been validated in conventional antidepressant or psychotherapy contexts, though, for MADRS, as well as for SSI, BDI, and HAM-D, efforts have been made towards investigating their psychometric properties in the field of rapid-acting antidepressants. The heterogeneity of suicidal behavior assessment in ketamine studies may hinder adequate comparisons between them. Although there does not seem to be a universally preferable instrument for measuring suicidal behavior to date, the MADRS potentially emerges as an adequately recommended choice.
针对自杀行为的评估方法多种多样,从抑郁量表到较长的自杀特异性工具,不一而足。在本综述中,我们系统地总结并讨论了氯胺酮及其对映体目前使用的自杀行为评估工具。我们在 Medline/PubMed、Embase 和 PsycINFO 数据库中检索了 2000 年 2 月至 2023 年 6 月期间发表的有关氯胺酮(及其对映体)对重度抑郁障碍患者抗自杀作用的人类研究。研究共收录了 46 项研究,确定了 16 种评估工具,其中大部分是明确的临床医师评定方法。主要工具包括蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)以及由临床医生和患者评定的贝克自杀意念量表(SSI 和 BSS)。据我们所知,除了自杀意念和行为评估工具(SIBAT)之外,似乎没有其他评估自杀倾向的工具是专门为测量速效抗抑郁药试验中的治疗反应而开发的。大多数量表已在传统的抗抑郁药物或心理治疗环境中得到验证,不过,对于 MADRS 以及 SSI、BDI 和 HAM-D 而言,人们已在努力研究它们在速效抗抑郁药物领域的心理测量特性。氯胺酮研究中自杀行为评估的异质性可能会妨碍对它们进行充分的比较。尽管迄今为止似乎还没有一种普遍适用的自杀行为测量工具,但 MADRS 有可能成为一种充分推荐的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信