Marginal resection preferred over radical resection for a large abdominal wall desmoid tumor during pregnancy: A case report

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Riku Watanabe , Hiroki Shinmura , Yasuyuki Yokoyama , Takashi Matsushima
{"title":"Marginal resection preferred over radical resection for a large abdominal wall desmoid tumor during pregnancy: A case report","authors":"Riku Watanabe ,&nbsp;Hiroki Shinmura ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Yokoyama ,&nbsp;Takashi Matsushima","doi":"10.1016/j.crwh.2025.e00701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Desmoid tumors are locally aggressive soft-tissue tumors known for their lack of metastatic potential but high recurrence rate after resection. Few cases of desmoid tumors during pregnancy have been reported, making treatment decisions more challenging.</div><div>This report presents the case of a woman with an abdominal wall desmoid tumor resected at 17 weeks of gestation. The large mass (13.4 cm × 7.4 cm) was compressing the uterus, which necessitated surgical intervention. Marginal resection of the tumor was performed with microscopically positive margins. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she had a normal vaginal delivery at 38 weeks. No recurrence of the tumor was observed at 24-month follow-up. This case represents the largest pregnancy-related abdominal desmoid tumor (22 cm × 12 cm) resected marginally during pregnancy. The procedure allowed for a vaginal delivery rather than a cesarean section.</div><div>Surgical management of desmoid tumors in pregnancy should aim to remove the tumor while preserving function and anatomical integrity. While this approach is feasible for smaller tumors, larger tumors, as in this case, may result in loss of function and anatomical structure. This raises the question of whether marginal resection should be considered when preservation of function and structure is not feasible with radical resection. This case reinforces the fundamental surgical principle that when clear surgical margins cannot be achieved without compromising function and structure, marginal resection should be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9657,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Women's Health","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article e00701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214911225000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Desmoid tumors are locally aggressive soft-tissue tumors known for their lack of metastatic potential but high recurrence rate after resection. Few cases of desmoid tumors during pregnancy have been reported, making treatment decisions more challenging.
This report presents the case of a woman with an abdominal wall desmoid tumor resected at 17 weeks of gestation. The large mass (13.4 cm × 7.4 cm) was compressing the uterus, which necessitated surgical intervention. Marginal resection of the tumor was performed with microscopically positive margins. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she had a normal vaginal delivery at 38 weeks. No recurrence of the tumor was observed at 24-month follow-up. This case represents the largest pregnancy-related abdominal desmoid tumor (22 cm × 12 cm) resected marginally during pregnancy. The procedure allowed for a vaginal delivery rather than a cesarean section.
Surgical management of desmoid tumors in pregnancy should aim to remove the tumor while preserving function and anatomical integrity. While this approach is feasible for smaller tumors, larger tumors, as in this case, may result in loss of function and anatomical structure. This raises the question of whether marginal resection should be considered when preservation of function and structure is not feasible with radical resection. This case reinforces the fundamental surgical principle that when clear surgical margins cannot be achieved without compromising function and structure, marginal resection should be considered.
妊娠期腹壁大硬纤维瘤边缘切除优于根治性切除1例
硬纤维瘤是一种局部侵袭性软组织肿瘤,因其缺乏转移潜力而闻名,但术后复发率高。妊娠期间发生硬纤维瘤的病例很少,这使得治疗决策更具挑战性。本报告提出的情况下,一个妇女与腹壁硬纤维瘤切除在妊娠17周。大肿块(13.4 cm × 7.4 cm)压迫子宫,需要手术干预。肿瘤的边缘切除在显微镜下呈阳性。患者的术后过程很顺利,她在38周时正常阴道分娩。随访24个月未见肿瘤复发。本病例为最大的妊娠相关腹部硬纤维瘤(22 cm × 12 cm),在妊娠期间被边缘切除。该手术允许阴道分娩而不是剖宫产。妊娠期硬纤维瘤的手术治疗应以切除肿瘤为目标,同时保留其功能和结构的完整性。虽然这种方法对较小的肿瘤是可行的,但像本病例一样,较大的肿瘤可能导致功能和解剖结构的丧失。这就提出了一个问题,当根治性切除不能保留功能和结构时,是否应该考虑边缘切除。本病例强化了外科手术的基本原则,即当不能在不损害功能和结构的情况下获得清晰的手术切缘时,应考虑边缘切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Case Reports in Women's Health
Case Reports in Women's Health Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
7 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信