Comparing soil microarthropod communities derived directly from soil DNA metabarcoding with those from morphological assessment in a drought-prone and irrigated pine forest

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Jessica Cuartero , Ivano Brunner , Marcus Schaub , Dariusz J. Gwiazdowicz , Piotr Skubała , Jiayi Qin , Paul Henning Krogh , Beat Frey
{"title":"Comparing soil microarthropod communities derived directly from soil DNA metabarcoding with those from morphological assessment in a drought-prone and irrigated pine forest","authors":"Jessica Cuartero ,&nbsp;Ivano Brunner ,&nbsp;Marcus Schaub ,&nbsp;Dariusz J. Gwiazdowicz ,&nbsp;Piotr Skubała ,&nbsp;Jiayi Qin ,&nbsp;Paul Henning Krogh ,&nbsp;Beat Frey","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Springtails (Collembola) and mites (Acari) are soil microarthropods, one of the most diverse animal groups in soils. They play a crucial role in organic matter cycling and are active throughout the food web as decomposers, bacterivores, fungivores, and carnivores. Only little is known about how these groups might respond to shifts in water availability, for example in the context of global change. Here, we investigated how soil microarthropods responded to long-term irrigation in a drought-prone Scots pine (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em>) forest in southern Switzerland. After more than a decade of doubling the annual rainfall, irrigation improved not only tree vitality but also soil quality, and with shifts in bacteria and fungi reflecting changes from oligotrophic to copiotrophic conditions. We assessed soil microarthropods with two approaches: (1) directly by soil DNA metabarcoding and (2) by morphological assessment after extraction of the animals with Macfadyen funnels. Another main aim of that study was to compare the results with the two approaches. The dominant Collembola genus in both assessment approaches was <em>Parisotoma</em>. The dominant Sarcoptiformes genus was <em>Oppiella</em> whereas <em>Geolaelaps was</em> the dominant Mesostigmata genus in both assessment approaches<em>.</em> Only the metabarcoding approach detected Trombidiformes genera, and only one genus, <em>Microtydeus</em>, had a classification confidence &gt;80 %.</div><div>The abundance and alpha-diversity of Collembola and Acari did not change significantly as a result of the irrigation treatment, regardless of the assessment approaches applied. In contrast, microarthropod beta-diversity showed significantly shifts for Collembola and Acari, and for the Collembola order Entomobryomorpha and the Acari orders Sarcoptiformes, Mesostigmata, and Trombidiformes. A Procrustes analysis comparing the two assessment approaches indicated a significant effect of the irrigation treatment for the mite order Sarcoptiformes and a nearly significant effect for Collembola.</div><div>Using indicator species analysis a <em>Parisotoma</em> species was the only Collembola taxon in the metabarcoding assessment that was strongly associated with the irrigation treatment. With the morphological assessment, <em>Parisotoma notabilis</em> and <em>Lepidocyrtus</em> sp. were significantly associated with irrigation. For Acari, only the morphological approach let to <em>Licnodamaeus pulcherrimus</em> as a negative indicator taxon for irrigation. By using the morphospecies lists as a reference for validation and comparing it with the species list obtained through metabarcoding, we found that only a small percentage of Collembola and Acari morphospecies overlapped. The metabarcoding approach detected taxa that were not observed with the morphological assessment, such as Neelipleona, Symphypleona, or Trombidiformes. Due to the complexity of the taxa and the lack of comprehensive taxonomic identification and reference databases, identification at the species level is hardly possible. Further efforts to enrich the microarthropod reference database are urgently needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 106042"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325001805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Springtails (Collembola) and mites (Acari) are soil microarthropods, one of the most diverse animal groups in soils. They play a crucial role in organic matter cycling and are active throughout the food web as decomposers, bacterivores, fungivores, and carnivores. Only little is known about how these groups might respond to shifts in water availability, for example in the context of global change. Here, we investigated how soil microarthropods responded to long-term irrigation in a drought-prone Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forest in southern Switzerland. After more than a decade of doubling the annual rainfall, irrigation improved not only tree vitality but also soil quality, and with shifts in bacteria and fungi reflecting changes from oligotrophic to copiotrophic conditions. We assessed soil microarthropods with two approaches: (1) directly by soil DNA metabarcoding and (2) by morphological assessment after extraction of the animals with Macfadyen funnels. Another main aim of that study was to compare the results with the two approaches. The dominant Collembola genus in both assessment approaches was Parisotoma. The dominant Sarcoptiformes genus was Oppiella whereas Geolaelaps was the dominant Mesostigmata genus in both assessment approaches. Only the metabarcoding approach detected Trombidiformes genera, and only one genus, Microtydeus, had a classification confidence >80 %.
The abundance and alpha-diversity of Collembola and Acari did not change significantly as a result of the irrigation treatment, regardless of the assessment approaches applied. In contrast, microarthropod beta-diversity showed significantly shifts for Collembola and Acari, and for the Collembola order Entomobryomorpha and the Acari orders Sarcoptiformes, Mesostigmata, and Trombidiformes. A Procrustes analysis comparing the two assessment approaches indicated a significant effect of the irrigation treatment for the mite order Sarcoptiformes and a nearly significant effect for Collembola.
Using indicator species analysis a Parisotoma species was the only Collembola taxon in the metabarcoding assessment that was strongly associated with the irrigation treatment. With the morphological assessment, Parisotoma notabilis and Lepidocyrtus sp. were significantly associated with irrigation. For Acari, only the morphological approach let to Licnodamaeus pulcherrimus as a negative indicator taxon for irrigation. By using the morphospecies lists as a reference for validation and comparing it with the species list obtained through metabarcoding, we found that only a small percentage of Collembola and Acari morphospecies overlapped. The metabarcoding approach detected taxa that were not observed with the morphological assessment, such as Neelipleona, Symphypleona, or Trombidiformes. Due to the complexity of the taxa and the lack of comprehensive taxonomic identification and reference databases, identification at the species level is hardly possible. Further efforts to enrich the microarthropod reference database are urgently needed.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信