Investigation on progressive damage evolution for low-velocity impact simulation of woven composites

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Shunqi Zhang , Dayou Ma , Mohammad Rezasefat , Sandro Campos Amico , Andrea Manes
{"title":"Investigation on progressive damage evolution for low-velocity impact simulation of woven composites","authors":"Shunqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Dayou Ma ,&nbsp;Mohammad Rezasefat ,&nbsp;Sandro Campos Amico ,&nbsp;Andrea Manes","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims at comparing the capability of three damage models, the enhanced composite damage model (MAT055), the Pinho laminated fracture model (MAT261), and the composite softening deformation gradient decomposition (DGD) model (MAT299) for woven composite materials, in predicting damage from low-velocity impacts. The first of them considers the empirical damage evolution with residual strength softening factors, and the other two control the damage evolution with fracture mechanism. To assess their predictive capabilities regarding mechanical response and damage, low-velocity impact (LVI) response of aramid-fibre epoxy plain-woven composites at four energy levels, from 27.9 J to 109.5 J, was investigated. A finite element model with macro-homogeneous solid element formulation was developed, and a rigorous calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters was conducted (for all material models). Low-velocity impact tests were performed to identify the different failure mechanisms, focusing on the penetration of the impactor into the woven composites. The MAT261 with linear damage evolution better fits the experimental data at high impact energy levels, where it demonstrates high accuracy on mechanical response and damage propagation area. However, it requires significantly longer computational time. Overall, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the limitations and advantages of those material models, providing insight into their suitability to simulate the impact behaviour of woven composites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 105316"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25000971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims at comparing the capability of three damage models, the enhanced composite damage model (MAT055), the Pinho laminated fracture model (MAT261), and the composite softening deformation gradient decomposition (DGD) model (MAT299) for woven composite materials, in predicting damage from low-velocity impacts. The first of them considers the empirical damage evolution with residual strength softening factors, and the other two control the damage evolution with fracture mechanism. To assess their predictive capabilities regarding mechanical response and damage, low-velocity impact (LVI) response of aramid-fibre epoxy plain-woven composites at four energy levels, from 27.9 J to 109.5 J, was investigated. A finite element model with macro-homogeneous solid element formulation was developed, and a rigorous calibration of the various physical and non-physical parameters was conducted (for all material models). Low-velocity impact tests were performed to identify the different failure mechanisms, focusing on the penetration of the impactor into the woven composites. The MAT261 with linear damage evolution better fits the experimental data at high impact energy levels, where it demonstrates high accuracy on mechanical response and damage propagation area. However, it requires significantly longer computational time. Overall, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the limitations and advantages of those material models, providing insight into their suitability to simulate the impact behaviour of woven composites.

Abstract Image

编织复合材料低速冲击模拟的渐进损伤演化研究
本研究旨在比较编织物复合材料的增强复合损伤模型(MAT055)、Pinho层合断裂模型(MAT261)和复合软化变形梯度分解(DGD)模型(MAT299)三种损伤模型预测低速冲击损伤的能力。前者考虑残余强度软化因素的经验损伤演化,后者考虑断裂机制的损伤演化。为了评估其对机械响应和损伤的预测能力,研究了芳纶纤维环氧平织复合材料在27.9 ~ 109.5 J四个能级下的低速冲击(LVI)响应。建立了宏观均质实体单元有限元模型,并对各种物理和非物理参数进行了严格的校准(适用于所有材料模型)。进行了低速冲击试验,以确定不同的破坏机制,重点研究了冲击器对编织复合材料的渗透。采用线性损伤演化的MAT261更符合高冲击能级下的实验数据,在力学响应和损伤扩展面积上具有较高的精度。然而,它需要更长的计算时间。总的来说,本研究提供了对这些材料模型的局限性和优势的深入了解,并提供了对其模拟编织复合材料冲击行为的适用性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信