Construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem service function and ecosystem sensitivity in the important ecological functional area — A case study in the Yellow River Basin

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Wei Wei , Yali Zhang , Xiaoxu Wei , Binbin Xie , Zhenyi Ma , Congying Liu , Lina Yu , Junju Zhou , Wei Shi , Ting Liu , Dang Lu
{"title":"Construction and optimization of ecological security patterns based on ecosystem service function and ecosystem sensitivity in the important ecological functional area — A case study in the Yellow River Basin","authors":"Wei Wei ,&nbsp;Yali Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaoxu Wei ,&nbsp;Binbin Xie ,&nbsp;Zhenyi Ma ,&nbsp;Congying Liu ,&nbsp;Lina Yu ,&nbsp;Junju Zhou ,&nbsp;Wei Shi ,&nbsp;Ting Liu ,&nbsp;Dang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As economic development and urban expansion accelerate, the degradation of ecosystem functions and the emergence of ecological and environmental challenges in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) underscore the urgent need to integrate ecosystems into social development for a robust ecological security pattern (ESP) assessment. Discussing the issue of ecological security (ES) and establishing its ESP are of vital significance for eco-protection and qualitative management of it. The objective of this research was to construct a comprehensive ESP for the YRB, designed to enhance ecological conservation and promote sustainable progress. This was achieved by leveraging ecosystem services (ESs) like habitat quality (HQ), water supply (WS), carbon sequestration (CS), and soil conservation (SC) from the period spanning 2010 to 2020. The approach utilized the source-corridor-pattern framework along with the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) and MCR (Minimum Cumulative Resistance) modeling tools to facilitate this research. The results indicated that: (1) There was a trend for ESs to exhibit increasing importance as one moved northward, with a corresponding decrease in the southern regions. The overall situation had been good and showed an increasing trend. (2) The ecosystem sensitivity within the YRB was characterized by lower levels in northern and southern extremities, contrasting with higher levels in the intervening regions. The Tibetan Plateau and Loess Plateau transition zone, as well as southern part of the Loess Plateau, had been primarily characterized by high sensitivity and medium sensitivity, respectively. (3) The ecological source area of the YRB increased from 22.65 % to 26.76 % in the research period. It densely distributed on the Loess Plateau and sparsely distributed in watersheds, with the land types dominated by grassland and forest land. High resistance values were predominantly observed in areas designated as unused land and within urban zones, whereas lower resistance values were primarily located along the water system. (4) There was a notable decrease in the count of ecological corridors, dropping from 34 to 23, with a significant concentration in the Ningxia Plain and across the Inner Mongolia Plateau from 2010 to 2020. A total of 10 ecological corridors, spanning 6300.25 km in length, have remained consistent over time. They connected the whole basin from upstream to downstream, creating a comprehensive network for ES. This research constructed the ESP framework which can provide the basis for the relevant departments to implement targeted protection of ES and ecological management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 107609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425000977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As economic development and urban expansion accelerate, the degradation of ecosystem functions and the emergence of ecological and environmental challenges in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) underscore the urgent need to integrate ecosystems into social development for a robust ecological security pattern (ESP) assessment. Discussing the issue of ecological security (ES) and establishing its ESP are of vital significance for eco-protection and qualitative management of it. The objective of this research was to construct a comprehensive ESP for the YRB, designed to enhance ecological conservation and promote sustainable progress. This was achieved by leveraging ecosystem services (ESs) like habitat quality (HQ), water supply (WS), carbon sequestration (CS), and soil conservation (SC) from the period spanning 2010 to 2020. The approach utilized the source-corridor-pattern framework along with the InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs) and MCR (Minimum Cumulative Resistance) modeling tools to facilitate this research. The results indicated that: (1) There was a trend for ESs to exhibit increasing importance as one moved northward, with a corresponding decrease in the southern regions. The overall situation had been good and showed an increasing trend. (2) The ecosystem sensitivity within the YRB was characterized by lower levels in northern and southern extremities, contrasting with higher levels in the intervening regions. The Tibetan Plateau and Loess Plateau transition zone, as well as southern part of the Loess Plateau, had been primarily characterized by high sensitivity and medium sensitivity, respectively. (3) The ecological source area of the YRB increased from 22.65 % to 26.76 % in the research period. It densely distributed on the Loess Plateau and sparsely distributed in watersheds, with the land types dominated by grassland and forest land. High resistance values were predominantly observed in areas designated as unused land and within urban zones, whereas lower resistance values were primarily located along the water system. (4) There was a notable decrease in the count of ecological corridors, dropping from 34 to 23, with a significant concentration in the Ningxia Plain and across the Inner Mongolia Plateau from 2010 to 2020. A total of 10 ecological corridors, spanning 6300.25 km in length, have remained consistent over time. They connected the whole basin from upstream to downstream, creating a comprehensive network for ES. This research constructed the ESP framework which can provide the basis for the relevant departments to implement targeted protection of ES and ecological management.

Abstract Image

基于生态服务功能和生态系统敏感性的重要生态功能区生态安全格局构建与优化——以黄河流域为例
随着经济发展和城市扩张的加速,黄河流域生态系统功能的退化和生态环境挑战的出现,迫切需要将生态系统与社会发展相结合,以实现稳健的生态安全格局评价。探讨生态安全问题,建立生态安全ESP,对生态保护和生态质量管理具有重要意义。本研究旨在构建长江三角洲综合生态系统规划,以加强生态保护,促进可持续发展。这是通过在2010年至2020年期间利用生态系统服务(ESs),如栖息地质量(HQ)、供水(WS)、碳封存(CS)和土壤保持(SC)来实现的。该方法利用源-走廊模式框架以及InVEST(生态系统服务和权衡的综合评估)和MCR(最小累积阻力)建模工具来促进这项研究。结果表明:(1)生态环境的重要性呈北上增加的趋势,南下相应降低;总的情况是好的,并有增加的趋势。(2)三峡库区南北端生态系统敏感性较低,中间区域生态系统敏感性较高;青藏高原和黄土高原过渡带以及黄土高原南部分别以高敏感性和中敏感性为主。(3)研究期间长江三角洲生态源区面积由22.65%增加到26.76%。黄土高原密集分布,流域稀疏分布,土地类型以草地和林地为主。高阻值主要出现在指定为未使用土地的地区和城市地区,而低阻值主要分布在水系沿线。(4) 2010 - 2020年,生态廊道数量从34个减少到23个,主要集中在宁夏平原和内蒙古高原。10条长6300.25 km的生态廊道在时间上保持一致。它们从上游到下游连接了整个盆地,为ES建立了一个全面的网络。本研究构建的ESP框架可为相关部门实施有针对性的ES保护和生态管理提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信