Study of the spatial distribution of the tension water storage capacity and hydrological simulation effects in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Pingshan Qin, Xingnan Zhang, Yuanhao Fang, Rui Qian, Zhongye Xia, Kaiqi Shen
{"title":"Study of the spatial distribution of the tension water storage capacity and hydrological simulation effects in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River","authors":"Pingshan Qin,&nbsp;Xingnan Zhang,&nbsp;Yuanhao Fang,&nbsp;Rui Qian,&nbsp;Zhongye Xia,&nbsp;Kaiqi Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tension water storage capacity is a pivotal variable in conceptual hydrological models, and its spatial distribution significantly influences runoff calculations. However, accurately characterizing its spatial variability remains a significant challenge. This study, based on the physical significance of tension water storage capacity, quantitatively calculates the tension water storage capacity for 95 subwatersheds in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Utilizing the grid-based tension water storage capacity data, three types of tension water storage capacity curves were constructed: the calibrated parabolic linetype (CPL), the fitted parabolic linetype (FPL), and the fitted straight linetype (FSL). Theoretical comparisons and rainfall-runoff simulation experiments were carried out in eight actual subwatersheds. The results indicate that, in theoretical runoff calculations, FSL demonstrates the smallest relative error during grid-based runoff computation, with a relative error of −25.40 % before the intersection point and 1.00 % after the intersection point. Furthermore, during rainfall-runoff simulation validation, the overall average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) for the eight subwatersheds using FSL was 0.85, compared to 0.80 for both CPL and FPL. This represents an improvement of 0.05 for FSL over CPL and FPL. Additionally, the average Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) value for FSL was 0.83, while CPL and FPL achieved 0.77 and 0.75, respectively, indicating that FSL outperformed CPL and FPL by 0.06 and 0.08, respectively. Therefore, based on both theoretical runoff calculations and rainfall-runoff simulations, the FSL more accurately describes the spatial distribution of tension water storage capacity within the watershed. This study provides a new alternative method for the spatial distribution of tension water storage capacity in hydrological modeling, improves the calculation method of streamflow production, and contributes to the development of hydrological modeling, which is useful for the efficiency of water resources utilization and flood risk reduction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"657 ","pages":"Article 133055"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003932","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tension water storage capacity is a pivotal variable in conceptual hydrological models, and its spatial distribution significantly influences runoff calculations. However, accurately characterizing its spatial variability remains a significant challenge. This study, based on the physical significance of tension water storage capacity, quantitatively calculates the tension water storage capacity for 95 subwatersheds in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Utilizing the grid-based tension water storage capacity data, three types of tension water storage capacity curves were constructed: the calibrated parabolic linetype (CPL), the fitted parabolic linetype (FPL), and the fitted straight linetype (FSL). Theoretical comparisons and rainfall-runoff simulation experiments were carried out in eight actual subwatersheds. The results indicate that, in theoretical runoff calculations, FSL demonstrates the smallest relative error during grid-based runoff computation, with a relative error of −25.40 % before the intersection point and 1.00 % after the intersection point. Furthermore, during rainfall-runoff simulation validation, the overall average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) for the eight subwatersheds using FSL was 0.85, compared to 0.80 for both CPL and FPL. This represents an improvement of 0.05 for FSL over CPL and FPL. Additionally, the average Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) value for FSL was 0.83, while CPL and FPL achieved 0.77 and 0.75, respectively, indicating that FSL outperformed CPL and FPL by 0.06 and 0.08, respectively. Therefore, based on both theoretical runoff calculations and rainfall-runoff simulations, the FSL more accurately describes the spatial distribution of tension water storage capacity within the watershed. This study provides a new alternative method for the spatial distribution of tension water storage capacity in hydrological modeling, improves the calculation method of streamflow production, and contributes to the development of hydrological modeling, which is useful for the efficiency of water resources utilization and flood risk reduction.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信