Evaluation of protective devices for the direct seeding of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris)

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY
Morgan D. Wingo, Anna L. Rose, Timothy H. Chesnut, Martin L. Cipollini
{"title":"Evaluation of protective devices for the direct seeding of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris)","authors":"Morgan D. Wingo,&nbsp;Anna L. Rose,&nbsp;Timothy H. Chesnut,&nbsp;Martin L. Cipollini","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most tree species, including longleaf pine (<em>Pinus palustris</em> Mill.; LLP) are established by planting seedlings during reforestation. Direct seeding could be a viable alternative; however, seed predation by various animals might be an impediment. While LLP are typically planted using nursery-grown plugs with high survival rates, planting these in certain sites may be difficult, and the appropriate genotype for a given site may not always be available. We expect that LLP seed and early seedling survival might reach acceptable rates when directly planted seeds are protected by shelters. We thus evaluated the effectiveness of degradable shelters (Seed Crowns™) for use in direct seeding of LLP. This project was carried out at two sites in middle Georgia and four sites on the Berry College campus near Rome, Georgia. At the middle Georgia sites, seeds were planted within shelters (no unprotected controls) across five subplots with varying numbers of planting spots at each site as a general test of field implementation. At Berry College, from 65 to 80 shelters were installed at each site along with 15 to 20 control spots (unprotected seeds). At the two middle Georgia sites respectively, 35 % and 77 % of seeds planted were living seedlings after ∼5 months and 52 % and 90 % of spots had at least one survivor. Across the Berry College sites after 5 months, sheltered seeds had an 86 %, 14 %, and 24 % improvement over controls in seeds (or seed coats) present, seedlings alive, and spots with at least one survivor, respectively. Taken together, these results suggest that direct seedling using these shelters may be a viable option for restoring longleaf pines when other considerations prevent or disfavor the use of containerized seedlings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719325000548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most tree species, including longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.; LLP) are established by planting seedlings during reforestation. Direct seeding could be a viable alternative; however, seed predation by various animals might be an impediment. While LLP are typically planted using nursery-grown plugs with high survival rates, planting these in certain sites may be difficult, and the appropriate genotype for a given site may not always be available. We expect that LLP seed and early seedling survival might reach acceptable rates when directly planted seeds are protected by shelters. We thus evaluated the effectiveness of degradable shelters (Seed Crowns™) for use in direct seeding of LLP. This project was carried out at two sites in middle Georgia and four sites on the Berry College campus near Rome, Georgia. At the middle Georgia sites, seeds were planted within shelters (no unprotected controls) across five subplots with varying numbers of planting spots at each site as a general test of field implementation. At Berry College, from 65 to 80 shelters were installed at each site along with 15 to 20 control spots (unprotected seeds). At the two middle Georgia sites respectively, 35 % and 77 % of seeds planted were living seedlings after ∼5 months and 52 % and 90 % of spots had at least one survivor. Across the Berry College sites after 5 months, sheltered seeds had an 86 %, 14 %, and 24 % improvement over controls in seeds (or seed coats) present, seedlings alive, and spots with at least one survivor, respectively. Taken together, these results suggest that direct seedling using these shelters may be a viable option for restoring longleaf pines when other considerations prevent or disfavor the use of containerized seedlings.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信