Sissel Kolls Bertelsen , Jordan P. Feekings , Marie Storr-Paulsen
{"title":"Untangling the net: Redefining fisheries management with fully documented fisheries","authors":"Sissel Kolls Bertelsen , Jordan P. Feekings , Marie Storr-Paulsen","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Technical measures (TMs) are widely used in fisheries management to regulate fishing operations and ensure sustainability. Categorised into input and output measures, TMs regulate various parts of the fishing process. However, the accumulation of TMs in regulations and limited monitoring and control adds complexity and rigidity to management systems. This study investigates whether Electronic Monitoring (EM) providing Fully Documented Fisheries (FDF) can fulfil the same objectives as some TMs, making these TMs redundant without compromising the sustainability of fish stocks. We developed a methodology to evaluate the different TMs and applied it in a case study focused on the Kattegat. Our findings indicate that most gear TMs could become redundant under FDF. In Kattegat, nearly half of the regulations, as well as the most complex ones, belong to this category. Hence, FDF could facilitate a notable simplification of the management system in this area. While some TMs remain necessary to incentivise selective fishing practices, FDF facilitates more flexible and adaptive management, aligning with the dynamic nature of fisheries. This study suggests that FDF could address the longstanding criticism of the complexity in the current management system and return responsibility of avoiding unwanted catches to the fishers. These findings are particularly relevant for fisheries managers, as regulatory simplification through FDF can create strong, long-term incentives for fishers to adopt EM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Technical measures (TMs) are widely used in fisheries management to regulate fishing operations and ensure sustainability. Categorised into input and output measures, TMs regulate various parts of the fishing process. However, the accumulation of TMs in regulations and limited monitoring and control adds complexity and rigidity to management systems. This study investigates whether Electronic Monitoring (EM) providing Fully Documented Fisheries (FDF) can fulfil the same objectives as some TMs, making these TMs redundant without compromising the sustainability of fish stocks. We developed a methodology to evaluate the different TMs and applied it in a case study focused on the Kattegat. Our findings indicate that most gear TMs could become redundant under FDF. In Kattegat, nearly half of the regulations, as well as the most complex ones, belong to this category. Hence, FDF could facilitate a notable simplification of the management system in this area. While some TMs remain necessary to incentivise selective fishing practices, FDF facilitates more flexible and adaptive management, aligning with the dynamic nature of fisheries. This study suggests that FDF could address the longstanding criticism of the complexity in the current management system and return responsibility of avoiding unwanted catches to the fishers. These findings are particularly relevant for fisheries managers, as regulatory simplification through FDF can create strong, long-term incentives for fishers to adopt EM.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.