Digital acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with chronic health conditions: Results from a waitlist-controlled trial

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Michael E. Levin , Ty B. Aller , Korena S. Klimczak , Marissa L. Donahue , Francesca M. Knudsen
{"title":"Digital acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with chronic health conditions: Results from a waitlist-controlled trial","authors":"Michael E. Levin ,&nbsp;Ty B. Aller ,&nbsp;Korena S. Klimczak ,&nbsp;Marissa L. Donahue ,&nbsp;Francesca M. Knudsen","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) provide a promising avenue for addressing the mental health needs of adults with chronic health conditions (CHCs). Transdiagnostic DMHIs, which apply to a range of conditions by focusing on common core processes of change (e.g., acceptance and commitment therapy; ACT), are particularly needed to address the various ways a wide range of CHCs impact quality of life. The present study evaluated an ACT DMHI designed to improve quality of life and mental health transdiagnostically for adults with CHCs. A sample of 100 adults with CHCs were randomized to ACT or waitlist, with baseline, 6-week, and 10-week assessment points. Recruitment (100 participants in 3 months with a wide range of CHCs), retention (84% at follow-up), and adherence rates (<em>M</em> = 4 of 6 sessions) indicated feasibility, with high program satisfaction ratings for acceptability. Only psychological flexibility improved more in ACT versus waitlist at post-intervention (6-week follow-up), with no differences on other outcomes until 10-week follow-up. Participants in ACT improved significantly more than waitlist at 10-week follow-up on the primary outcome of quality of life as well as functional impairment from CHCs and psychological flexibility. An exploratory moderation test suggested participants with elevated mental health symptoms at baseline improved more on these symptoms in ACT relative to waitlist at 10-week follow-up. Overall, results support the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a transdiagnostic ACT DMHI to improve quality of life and mental health for adults with a wide range of CHCs.</div></div><div><h3>Clinicaltrialsgov identifier</h3><div>NCT06179264.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 104729"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725000518","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) provide a promising avenue for addressing the mental health needs of adults with chronic health conditions (CHCs). Transdiagnostic DMHIs, which apply to a range of conditions by focusing on common core processes of change (e.g., acceptance and commitment therapy; ACT), are particularly needed to address the various ways a wide range of CHCs impact quality of life. The present study evaluated an ACT DMHI designed to improve quality of life and mental health transdiagnostically for adults with CHCs. A sample of 100 adults with CHCs were randomized to ACT or waitlist, with baseline, 6-week, and 10-week assessment points. Recruitment (100 participants in 3 months with a wide range of CHCs), retention (84% at follow-up), and adherence rates (M = 4 of 6 sessions) indicated feasibility, with high program satisfaction ratings for acceptability. Only psychological flexibility improved more in ACT versus waitlist at post-intervention (6-week follow-up), with no differences on other outcomes until 10-week follow-up. Participants in ACT improved significantly more than waitlist at 10-week follow-up on the primary outcome of quality of life as well as functional impairment from CHCs and psychological flexibility. An exploratory moderation test suggested participants with elevated mental health symptoms at baseline improved more on these symptoms in ACT relative to waitlist at 10-week follow-up. Overall, results support the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a transdiagnostic ACT DMHI to improve quality of life and mental health for adults with a wide range of CHCs.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier

NCT06179264.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信