Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sandra Jazmin Barragan-Contreras, Matthew Paterson, James Jackson, Silke Trommer, Pritish Behuria, Sam Hickey
{"title":"Capturing the disruptive nature of green energy transitions: A political economy approach","authors":"Sandra Jazmin Barragan-Contreras,&nbsp;Matthew Paterson,&nbsp;James Jackson,&nbsp;Silke Trommer,&nbsp;Pritish Behuria,&nbsp;Sam Hickey","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper seeks to develop a new analytical framework for understanding the disruptive dynamics of green energy transitions. While the empirical reality of such disruptions is widely recognised, the only literature within which disruption has been explicitly conceptualised is that arising within the socio-technical transitions research tradition through the notion of “disruptive innovation.” We argue that this approach, centred on technological innovations by firms that disrupt existing markets, consumers, and regulatory arrangements, is too narrow to capture the full range of disruptive dynamics associated with green energy transitions and that a framework rooted in critical political economy approaches is needed to do so. After surveying the various literatures that demonstrate this full range of disruptive dynamics, we propose a definition of disruption and an analytical framework that can both capture the existing empirical research on such disruptions and generate future research. Our analysis reveals that the disruptions associated with GETS are not merely by-products of the transition process but are central to the way these transitions unfold.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 104039"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625001203","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to develop a new analytical framework for understanding the disruptive dynamics of green energy transitions. While the empirical reality of such disruptions is widely recognised, the only literature within which disruption has been explicitly conceptualised is that arising within the socio-technical transitions research tradition through the notion of “disruptive innovation.” We argue that this approach, centred on technological innovations by firms that disrupt existing markets, consumers, and regulatory arrangements, is too narrow to capture the full range of disruptive dynamics associated with green energy transitions and that a framework rooted in critical political economy approaches is needed to do so. After surveying the various literatures that demonstrate this full range of disruptive dynamics, we propose a definition of disruption and an analytical framework that can both capture the existing empirical research on such disruptions and generate future research. Our analysis reveals that the disruptions associated with GETS are not merely by-products of the transition process but are central to the way these transitions unfold.
捕捉绿色能源转型的破坏性本质:一种政治经济学方法
本文试图建立一个新的分析框架来理解绿色能源转型的破坏性动态。虽然这种颠覆的经验现实得到了广泛认可,但唯一将颠覆明确概念化的文献是通过“颠覆性创新”概念在社会技术转型研究传统中产生的。我们认为,这种以颠覆现有市场、消费者和监管安排的公司的技术创新为中心的方法过于狭隘,无法捕捉到与绿色能源转型相关的颠覆性动态的全部范围,需要一个植根于批判性政治经济学方法的框架来做到这一点。在调查了展示这种全方位颠覆性动态的各种文献之后,我们提出了颠覆性的定义和分析框架,既可以捕捉到对这种颠覆性的现有实证研究,又可以产生未来的研究。我们的分析表明,与get相关的中断不仅仅是过渡过程的副产品,而且是这些过渡展开方式的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信