On the greenness of recent microwave-assisted digestion methods: An evaluation with AGREEprep

IF 5.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Juan L. Benedé , Francisco Pena-Pereira
{"title":"On the greenness of recent microwave-assisted digestion methods: An evaluation with AGREEprep","authors":"Juan L. Benedé ,&nbsp;Francisco Pena-Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2025.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microwave-assisted digestion (MAD) is a widely used technique for the preparation of samples for elemental analysis. Significant advances toward more efficient and less hazardous MAD methods have been described in recent years, even though no systematic evaluation has been carried out in terms of green sample preparation. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and environmental impact of recent MAD methods through the lens of AGREEprep, a recognized metric tool that identifies the greenness attributes of sample preparation methods. The metric tool was employed for the assessment of 38 decomposition methods for food analysis, including MAD methods involving decreasing amounts of oxidizing agents, considering supplemental reagents and assistances, such as oxygen pressure, hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet irradiation, and microwave-induced combustion. In addition, conventional decomposition methods and alternative approaches involving infrared heating have been considered in the assessment. The 38 methods received overall scores in a wide range of 0.14 to 0.52, being MAD methods without acid consumption and those involving combustion the greenest methods (scores from 0.40 to 0.52). By systematically evaluating key criteria, such as reagent usage, energy consumption, process safety, and waste generation, AGREEprep provides a comprehensive view of MAD methods that can contribute to further improvements toward more sustainable analytical practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582025000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microwave-assisted digestion (MAD) is a widely used technique for the preparation of samples for elemental analysis. Significant advances toward more efficient and less hazardous MAD methods have been described in recent years, even though no systematic evaluation has been carried out in terms of green sample preparation. The present work evaluates the effectiveness and environmental impact of recent MAD methods through the lens of AGREEprep, a recognized metric tool that identifies the greenness attributes of sample preparation methods. The metric tool was employed for the assessment of 38 decomposition methods for food analysis, including MAD methods involving decreasing amounts of oxidizing agents, considering supplemental reagents and assistances, such as oxygen pressure, hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet irradiation, and microwave-induced combustion. In addition, conventional decomposition methods and alternative approaches involving infrared heating have been considered in the assessment. The 38 methods received overall scores in a wide range of 0.14 to 0.52, being MAD methods without acid consumption and those involving combustion the greenest methods (scores from 0.40 to 0.52). By systematically evaluating key criteria, such as reagent usage, energy consumption, process safety, and waste generation, AGREEprep provides a comprehensive view of MAD methods that can contribute to further improvements toward more sustainable analytical practices.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信