Code-Free Deep Learning Glaucoma Detection on Color Fundus Images

IF 3.2 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Daniel Milad MD , Fares Antaki MDCM , David Mikhail MD (C), MSc (C) , Andrew Farah MDCM (C) , Jonathan El-Khoury MD , Samir Touma MD , Georges M. Durr MD , Taylor Nayman MD , Clément Playout PhD (C) , Pearse A. Keane MD, FRCOphth , Renaud Duval MD
{"title":"Code-Free Deep Learning Glaucoma Detection on Color Fundus Images","authors":"Daniel Milad MD ,&nbsp;Fares Antaki MDCM ,&nbsp;David Mikhail MD (C), MSc (C) ,&nbsp;Andrew Farah MDCM (C) ,&nbsp;Jonathan El-Khoury MD ,&nbsp;Samir Touma MD ,&nbsp;Georges M. Durr MD ,&nbsp;Taylor Nayman MD ,&nbsp;Clément Playout PhD (C) ,&nbsp;Pearse A. Keane MD, FRCOphth ,&nbsp;Renaud Duval MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Code-free deep learning (CFDL) allows clinicians with no coding experience to build their own artificial intelligence models. This study assesses the performance of CFDL in glaucoma detection from fundus images in comparison to expert-designed models.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Deep learning model development, testing, and validation.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>A total of 101 442 labeled fundus images from the Rotterdam EyePACS Artificial Intelligence for Robust Glaucoma Screening (AIROGS) dataset were included.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ophthalmology trainees without coding experience designed a CFDL binary model using the Rotterdam EyePACS AIROGS dataset of fundus images (101 442 labeled images) to differentiate glaucoma from normal optic nerves. We compared our results with bespoke models from the literature. We then proceeded to externally validate our model using 2 datasets, the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge (REFUGE) and the Glaucoma grading from Multi-Modality imAges (GAMMA) at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 confidence thresholds.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Area under the precision-recall curve (AuPRC), sensitivity at 95% specificity (SE@95SP), accuracy, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and positive predictive value (PPV).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The CFDL model showed high performance metrics that were comparable to the bespoke deep learning models. Our single-label classification model had an AuPRC of 0.988, an SE@95SP of 95%, and an accuracy of 91% (compared with 85% SE@95SP for the top bespoke models). Using the REFUGE dataset for external validation, our model had an SE@95SP, AUC, PPV, and accuracy of 83%, 0.960%, 73% to 94%, and 95% to 98%, respectively, at the 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 confidence threshold cutoffs. Using the GAMMA dataset for external validation at the same confidence threshold cutoffs, our model had an SE@95SP, AUC, PPV, and accuracy of 98%, 0.994%, 94% to 96%, and 94% to 97%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The capacity of CFDL models to perform glaucoma screening using fundus images presents a compelling proof of concept, empowering clinicians to explore innovative model designs for broad glaucoma screening in the near future.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100721"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525000193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Code-free deep learning (CFDL) allows clinicians with no coding experience to build their own artificial intelligence models. This study assesses the performance of CFDL in glaucoma detection from fundus images in comparison to expert-designed models.

Design

Deep learning model development, testing, and validation.

Subjects

A total of 101 442 labeled fundus images from the Rotterdam EyePACS Artificial Intelligence for Robust Glaucoma Screening (AIROGS) dataset were included.

Methods

Ophthalmology trainees without coding experience designed a CFDL binary model using the Rotterdam EyePACS AIROGS dataset of fundus images (101 442 labeled images) to differentiate glaucoma from normal optic nerves. We compared our results with bespoke models from the literature. We then proceeded to externally validate our model using 2 datasets, the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge (REFUGE) and the Glaucoma grading from Multi-Modality imAges (GAMMA) at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 confidence thresholds.

Main Outcome Measures

Area under the precision-recall curve (AuPRC), sensitivity at 95% specificity (SE@95SP), accuracy, area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), and positive predictive value (PPV).

Results

The CFDL model showed high performance metrics that were comparable to the bespoke deep learning models. Our single-label classification model had an AuPRC of 0.988, an SE@95SP of 95%, and an accuracy of 91% (compared with 85% SE@95SP for the top bespoke models). Using the REFUGE dataset for external validation, our model had an SE@95SP, AUC, PPV, and accuracy of 83%, 0.960%, 73% to 94%, and 95% to 98%, respectively, at the 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 confidence threshold cutoffs. Using the GAMMA dataset for external validation at the same confidence threshold cutoffs, our model had an SE@95SP, AUC, PPV, and accuracy of 98%, 0.994%, 94% to 96%, and 94% to 97%, respectively.

Conclusion

The capacity of CFDL models to perform glaucoma screening using fundus images presents a compelling proof of concept, empowering clinicians to explore innovative model designs for broad glaucoma screening in the near future.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信