The effectiveness of the Halliwick concept hydrotherapy and Bobath (Neurodevelopmental Treatment-NDT) in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy–A randomised controlled trial

Konstantinos Chandolias , Eleni Argyroula Tsounia , Nikolaos Strimpakos , Efthalia Zogka , Thomas Besios , Georgios Marios Kyriakatis , Panagiotis Tsimeas , Athanasios Tsiokanos
{"title":"The effectiveness of the Halliwick concept hydrotherapy and Bobath (Neurodevelopmental Treatment-NDT) in the treatment of children with cerebral palsy–A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Konstantinos Chandolias ,&nbsp;Eleni Argyroula Tsounia ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Strimpakos ,&nbsp;Efthalia Zogka ,&nbsp;Thomas Besios ,&nbsp;Georgios Marios Kyriakatis ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Tsimeas ,&nbsp;Athanasios Tsiokanos","doi":"10.1016/j.dscb.2025.100213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often face challenges in motor function, balance, and daily activities. While land-based therapies such as the Bobath concept are widely used, complementary water-based therapies, including the Halliwick concept, offer unique opportunities to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Halliwick concept hydrotherapy on gross motor function, balance, speed, and daily life skills in children with CP. A secondary objective was to compare the combined intervention of Halliwick hydrotherapy and Bobath therapy (NDT) with Bobath therapy (NDT)alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 80 children with CP (mean age: 7.53 years) participated in this 9-month long randomised controlled trial. Participants were divided into three groups: the intervention group (<em>n</em> = 40), which received one session per week of both Halliwick hydrotherapy and Bobath therapy; control group 1 (<em>n</em> = 35), which received two sessions of Bobath therapy (NDT)per week; and control group 2 (<em>n</em> = 5), which did not receive any intervention. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the GMFM, PEDI, PBS, and TUG between time and groups, while a paired <em>t</em>-test to assess water-based (WOTA 1 &amp; 2, SWIM, HAAR) through time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Statistically significant improvements were observed in the intervention group when compared with control groups across all measures. The intervention group demonstrated greater gains in gross motor function, balance, daily activities, and speed, using the TUG test, compared to control group 1, with minimal changes observed in control group 2. Notable improvements included increased GMFM scores (6points improvement in the intervention group compared to 3.36 in control group 1(Wilks's Lambda = 0.807, <em>F</em> = 9.222, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.193, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)), balance (PBS: +3.8 points(Wilks's Lambda = 0.778, <em>F</em> = 11.002, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.222, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001)), and daily activities (PEDI: +6.32 points(Wilks's Lambda = 0.849, <em>F</em> = 6.854, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.151, <em>p</em> = 0.002)). Water-based assessments further highlighted substantial improvements in aquatic skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Incorporating Halliwick hydrotherapy into rehabilitation programs for children with CP yields significant benefits, enhancing motor skills, balance, and daily functioning beyond what is achieved with land-based interventions alone. These findings highlight the importance of integrating complementary aquatic therapies into routine clinical practice for children with CP. Further research with larger, homogeneous samples and extended intervention durations is recommended to refine these therapeutic approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72447,"journal":{"name":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666459325000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often face challenges in motor function, balance, and daily activities. While land-based therapies such as the Bobath concept are widely used, complementary water-based therapies, including the Halliwick concept, offer unique opportunities to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Halliwick concept hydrotherapy on gross motor function, balance, speed, and daily life skills in children with CP. A secondary objective was to compare the combined intervention of Halliwick hydrotherapy and Bobath therapy (NDT) with Bobath therapy (NDT)alone.

Methods

A total of 80 children with CP (mean age: 7.53 years) participated in this 9-month long randomised controlled trial. Participants were divided into three groups: the intervention group (n = 40), which received one session per week of both Halliwick hydrotherapy and Bobath therapy; control group 1 (n = 35), which received two sessions of Bobath therapy (NDT)per week; and control group 2 (n = 5), which did not receive any intervention. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to compare the GMFM, PEDI, PBS, and TUG between time and groups, while a paired t-test to assess water-based (WOTA 1 & 2, SWIM, HAAR) through time.

Results

Statistically significant improvements were observed in the intervention group when compared with control groups across all measures. The intervention group demonstrated greater gains in gross motor function, balance, daily activities, and speed, using the TUG test, compared to control group 1, with minimal changes observed in control group 2. Notable improvements included increased GMFM scores (6points improvement in the intervention group compared to 3.36 in control group 1(Wilks's Lambda = 0.807, F = 9.222, partial η2 = 0.193, p < 0.001)), balance (PBS: +3.8 points(Wilks's Lambda = 0.778, F = 11.002, partial η2 = 0.222, p < 0.001)), and daily activities (PEDI: +6.32 points(Wilks's Lambda = 0.849, F = 6.854, partial η2 = 0.151, p = 0.002)). Water-based assessments further highlighted substantial improvements in aquatic skills.

Conclusion

Incorporating Halliwick hydrotherapy into rehabilitation programs for children with CP yields significant benefits, enhancing motor skills, balance, and daily functioning beyond what is achieved with land-based interventions alone. These findings highlight the importance of integrating complementary aquatic therapies into routine clinical practice for children with CP. Further research with larger, homogeneous samples and extended intervention durations is recommended to refine these therapeutic approaches.
Halliwick概念水疗法和Bobath(神经发育治疗- ndt)治疗儿童脑瘫的有效性-一项随机对照试验
背景:脑瘫儿童经常面临运动功能、平衡和日常活动方面的挑战。虽然Bobath概念等陆地疗法被广泛使用,但包括Halliwick概念在内的互补水基疗法为提高康复效果提供了独特的机会。目的本研究旨在评估哈利威克水疗法对CP儿童大运动功能、平衡、速度和日常生活技能的影响。第二个目的是比较哈利威克水疗法和浴缸疗法(NDT)联合干预与单独浴缸疗法(NDT)的效果。方法共80例CP患儿(平均年龄7.53岁)参加为期9个月的随机对照试验。参与者被分为三组:干预组(n = 40),每周接受一次Halliwick水疗和Bobath水疗;对照组1 (n = 35),每周接受两次Bobath疗法(NDT);对照组2 (n = 5)不进行任何干预。采用双向重复测量方差分析比较时间和组间的GMFM、PEDI、PBS和TUG,采用配对t检验评估水基(wota1 &;游泳,穿越时间。结果与对照组相比,干预组在所有指标上均有统计学上的显著改善。通过TUG测试,与对照组1相比,干预组在大运动功能、平衡、日常活动和速度方面表现出更大的进步,而对照组2的变化很小。显著改善包括GMFM评分增加(干预组提高6分,对照组提高3.36分)(Wilks’s Lambda = 0.807, F = 9.222,偏η2 = 0.193, p <;0.001)),平衡(PBS: +3.8点(Wilks’s Lambda = 0.778, F = 11.002, partial η2 = 0.222, p <;0.001)和日常活动(PEDI: +6.32点(Wilks’s Lambda = 0.849, F = 6.854,偏η2 = 0.151, p = 0.002))。基于水的评估进一步强调了水生技能的重大改进。结论:将哈利威克水疗纳入儿童脑瘫的康复计划中,可以显著提高运动技能、平衡能力和日常功能,而不仅仅是陆地干预。这些发现强调了将补充水生疗法整合到CP儿童常规临床实践中的重要性。建议采用更大、均匀样本和延长干预时间的进一步研究来完善这些治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信