Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018

Ruby Barnard-Mayers MPH , Eugene Declercq PhD , Eleanor J. Murray ScD , Tina D. Yarrington MD, FACOG , Martha M. Werler DSc
{"title":"Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018","authors":"Ruby Barnard-Mayers MPH ,&nbsp;Eugene Declercq PhD ,&nbsp;Eleanor J. Murray ScD ,&nbsp;Tina D. Yarrington MD, FACOG ,&nbsp;Martha M. Werler DSc","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cesarean delivery rates in the United States far exceed the World Health Organization (WHO)’s recommended population cesarean rate of 15%. This has resulted in calls from experts to reduce cesarean delivery rates. However, crude cesarean delivery rates are not necessarily comparable across populations since different birthing populations have different distributions of underlying cesarean delivery risk factors. WHO recommends using the Robson classification system to compare standardized cesarean delivery rates across populations, though it has been rarely used within the U.S.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objectives of this study were to understand the distribution of cesarean deliveries using the Robson Classification system and to identify associated conditions (and potential drivers) of cesarean delivery across Robson groups.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Our data comes from the Pregnancy and Early Life Longitudinal Data System from the Massachusetts Department of Health, which contains all birth certificate records for Massachusetts from 2011 to 2018. Using the WHO Robson Classification System Implementation guide, we categorized births into one of its 10 categories based on data from birth certificate records and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from billing records. Using the linked birth certificate records and hospital discharge records we went beyond the Robson classifications and examined patterns in maternal comorbidities and labor and delivery complications of cesarean deliveries across Robson groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 25% of birthing people who had singleton, term, vertex births with spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 15% for nulliparous and 3% for multiparous (with no prior cesarean). The prevalence of maternal risk factors was 28% in the former and 30% in the latter. Labor and delivery complications were present in 46% and 35% of births, respectively. Birthing people with breech or transverse fetal presentation had the highest cesarean delivery rates around 95%. Multiparous birthing people with a prior cesarean delivery and cephalic, singleton, term births were the largest contributor to the cesarean delivery rate (38% of all cesareans). Almost all births for malpresentation or malposition of fetus had at least one labor and delivery complication but much lower rates of risk factors (between 25% and 46%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While cesarean delivery rates, maternal risk factors, and labor and delivery complications followed similar patterns across Robson groups, there were notable discrepancies, especially in births with noncephalic presentations where maternal comorbidity rates matched lower cesarean-risk groups like the nulliparous single-term cephalic births.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577825000310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cesarean delivery rates in the United States far exceed the World Health Organization (WHO)’s recommended population cesarean rate of 15%. This has resulted in calls from experts to reduce cesarean delivery rates. However, crude cesarean delivery rates are not necessarily comparable across populations since different birthing populations have different distributions of underlying cesarean delivery risk factors. WHO recommends using the Robson classification system to compare standardized cesarean delivery rates across populations, though it has been rarely used within the U.S.

Objective

The objectives of this study were to understand the distribution of cesarean deliveries using the Robson Classification system and to identify associated conditions (and potential drivers) of cesarean delivery across Robson groups.

Study Design

Our data comes from the Pregnancy and Early Life Longitudinal Data System from the Massachusetts Department of Health, which contains all birth certificate records for Massachusetts from 2011 to 2018. Using the WHO Robson Classification System Implementation guide, we categorized births into one of its 10 categories based on data from birth certificate records and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from billing records. Using the linked birth certificate records and hospital discharge records we went beyond the Robson classifications and examined patterns in maternal comorbidities and labor and delivery complications of cesarean deliveries across Robson groups.

Results

Among the 25% of birthing people who had singleton, term, vertex births with spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 15% for nulliparous and 3% for multiparous (with no prior cesarean). The prevalence of maternal risk factors was 28% in the former and 30% in the latter. Labor and delivery complications were present in 46% and 35% of births, respectively. Birthing people with breech or transverse fetal presentation had the highest cesarean delivery rates around 95%. Multiparous birthing people with a prior cesarean delivery and cephalic, singleton, term births were the largest contributor to the cesarean delivery rate (38% of all cesareans). Almost all births for malpresentation or malposition of fetus had at least one labor and delivery complication but much lower rates of risk factors (between 25% and 46%).

Conclusion

While cesarean delivery rates, maternal risk factors, and labor and delivery complications followed similar patterns across Robson groups, there were notable discrepancies, especially in births with noncephalic presentations where maternal comorbidity rates matched lower cesarean-risk groups like the nulliparous single-term cephalic births.
使用关联数据探索2011年至2018年马萨诸塞州与罗布森剖宫产分类相关的医学并发症
背景:美国的剖宫产率远远超过世界卫生组织(WHO)推荐的人口剖宫产率15%。这导致专家呼吁降低剖宫产率。然而,剖宫产粗分娩率不一定具有人群间的可比性,因为不同的出生人群具有不同的剖宫产潜在危险因素分布。世卫组织建议使用Robson分类系统来比较不同人群的标准化剖宫产率,尽管它在美国很少使用。目的本研究的目的是了解使用Robson分类系统的剖宫产分布,并确定Robson组剖宫产的相关条件(和潜在驱动因素)。研究设计我们的数据来自马萨诸塞州卫生部的怀孕和早期生活纵向数据系统,该系统包含了马萨诸塞州2011年至2018年的所有出生证明记录。我们使用世卫组织Robson分类系统实施指南,根据出生证明记录的数据和计费记录中的ICD-9和ICD-10代码,将出生分为10个类别之一。利用相关的出生证明记录和出院记录,我们超越了罗布森分类,检查了罗布森组中产妇合并症和剖宫产分娩并发症的模式。结果25%的单胎、足月、顺产产妇中,无产者剖宫产率为15%,多产(未剖宫产)者剖宫产率为3%。前者的产妇危险因素患病率为28%,后者为30%。分娩和分娩并发症分别占46%和35%。臀位或横位胎儿分娩的人剖宫产率最高,约为95%。有过剖宫产史和头胎、单胎、足月分娩史的多胎分娩者是导致剖宫产率的最大因素(占所有剖宫产者的38%)。几乎所有因胎儿胎位不当或胎位不当而出生的人都至少有一种分娩和分娩并发症,但风险因素的比例要低得多(在25%至46%之间)。结论:虽然剖宫产率、产妇危险因素、分娩和分娩并发症在Robson组中具有相似的模式,但存在显著差异,特别是在非头宫产的分娩中,产妇合并率与低剖宫产风险组(如无产单足月头宫产)相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信