Composite socio-environmental risk score for cardiovascular assessment: An explainable machine learning approach

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zhuo Chen , Jean-Eudes Dazard , Pedro Rafael Vieira de Oliveira Salerno , Santosh Kumar Sirasapalli , Mohamed HE Makhlouf , Sanjay Rajagopalan , Sadeer Al-Kindi
{"title":"Composite socio-environmental risk score for cardiovascular assessment: An explainable machine learning approach","authors":"Zhuo Chen ,&nbsp;Jean-Eudes Dazard ,&nbsp;Pedro Rafael Vieira de Oliveira Salerno ,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Sirasapalli ,&nbsp;Mohamed HE Makhlouf ,&nbsp;Sanjay Rajagopalan ,&nbsp;Sadeer Al-Kindi","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading global cause of death, with socio-environmental factors significantly influencing morbidity and mortality. Understanding these factors is essential for improving risk assessments and interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and evaluate the predictive power of a composite socio-environmental (SE) cardiovascular risk score in forecasting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients, considering both traditional and novel socio-environmental risk factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A Survival Random Forest (RSF) model was used to create a composite socio-environmental (SE) cardiovascular risk score using 22 census-tract level variables from 62,438 patients in the CLARIFY registry undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. A Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) model was then applied to assess the association between the SE-MACE risk score and MACE in a hold-out test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to identify variable importance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 62,438 individuals (mean age 59.6 years, 53.2 % female, 87.7 % White). Hypertension (55.4 %), diabetes (15.7 %), and dyslipidemia (72.3 %) were common, with a median CAC score of 168. The RSF model showed a concordance index of 0.58, with significant factors including smoking prevalence, insurance status, and median household income impacting cardiovascular risk. The SE-MACE risk score was robustly associated with MACE (HR, 1.21 [95 % CI, 1.11-1.32]), independent of clinical variables and the CAC score. Kaplan-Meier analysis highlighted clear risk stratification across SE-MACE score quartiles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The SE-MACE risk score effectively incorporates socio-environmental factors into cardiovascular risk assessment, identifying individuals at higher risk for MACE and supporting the need for holistic assessment frameworks. Further validation in diverse settings is recommended to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100964"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading global cause of death, with socio-environmental factors significantly influencing morbidity and mortality. Understanding these factors is essential for improving risk assessments and interventions.

Objective

To develop and evaluate the predictive power of a composite socio-environmental (SE) cardiovascular risk score in forecasting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients, considering both traditional and novel socio-environmental risk factors.

Methods

A Survival Random Forest (RSF) model was used to create a composite socio-environmental (SE) cardiovascular risk score using 22 census-tract level variables from 62,438 patients in the CLARIFY registry undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. A Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) model was then applied to assess the association between the SE-MACE risk score and MACE in a hold-out test set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to identify variable importance.

Results

The study included 62,438 individuals (mean age 59.6 years, 53.2 % female, 87.7 % White). Hypertension (55.4 %), diabetes (15.7 %), and dyslipidemia (72.3 %) were common, with a median CAC score of 168. The RSF model showed a concordance index of 0.58, with significant factors including smoking prevalence, insurance status, and median household income impacting cardiovascular risk. The SE-MACE risk score was robustly associated with MACE (HR, 1.21 [95 % CI, 1.11-1.32]), independent of clinical variables and the CAC score. Kaplan-Meier analysis highlighted clear risk stratification across SE-MACE score quartiles.

Conclusion

The SE-MACE risk score effectively incorporates socio-environmental factors into cardiovascular risk assessment, identifying individuals at higher risk for MACE and supporting the need for holistic assessment frameworks. Further validation in diverse settings is recommended to confirm these findings.
心血管评估的综合社会环境风险评分:一种可解释的机器学习方法
背景:心血管疾病(CVD)是全球主要的死亡原因,社会环境因素对发病率和死亡率有显著影响。了解这些因素对于改进风险评估和干预措施至关重要。目的建立并评估综合社会环境(SE)心血管风险评分在预测患者主要心血管不良事件(MACE)中的预测能力,同时考虑传统和新的社会环境风险因素。方法采用生存随机森林(RSF)模型,利用22个人口普查区水平变量,从62438名接受冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分的患者中创建复合社会环境(SE)心血管风险评分。然后应用Cox比例风险(CPH)模型评估在hold- hold测试集中SE-MACE风险评分与MACE之间的关系。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值用于确定变量的重要性。结果共纳入62438例患者,平均年龄59.6岁,女性53.2%,白人87.7%。常见的有高血压(55.4%)、糖尿病(15.7%)和血脂异常(72.3%),中位CAC评分为168。RSF模型的一致性指数为0.58,吸烟状况、保险状况和家庭收入中位数对心血管风险有显著影响。SE-MACE风险评分与MACE显著相关(HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.32]),独立于临床变量和CAC评分。Kaplan-Meier分析强调了SE-MACE评分四分位数之间明显的风险分层。结论SE-MACE风险评分有效地将社会环境因素纳入心血管风险评估,识别MACE高风险个体,支持整体评估框架的必要性。建议在不同环境下进一步验证以证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信