Examining collision avoidance behavior of distracted drivers: A correlated grouped random parameters accelerated failure time model with heterogeneity-in-means
Qikai Qu , Yasir Ali , Yongjun Shen , Qiong Bao , Md Mazharul Haque
{"title":"Examining collision avoidance behavior of distracted drivers: A correlated grouped random parameters accelerated failure time model with heterogeneity-in-means","authors":"Qikai Qu , Yasir Ali , Yongjun Shen , Qiong Bao , Md Mazharul Haque","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Current research mostly studied the driving behavior of distracted drivers in abrupt situations, but different types of distraction may lead to differential crash risks, particularly during collision avoidance, which has been overlooked in the literature. As such, this study investigated and compared drivers’ collision avoidance performance under different distraction conditions. Forty-four licensed drivers completed driving simulation experiments under normal driving, cognitive distraction, and manual distraction conditions. To comprehend the collision avoidance behavior under different distraction conditions, this study analyzed hazard response time, deceleration time, and collision avoidance time—critical components in avoiding secondary collisions. For these performance measures, correlated grouped random parameters accelerated failure time models were developed, considering repeated experiment design and unobserved heterogeneity. Results indicate that drivers in manual distraction took more time to respond during the hazard response phase compared to cognitive distraction. The majority of distracted drivers were observed to spend less time decelerating and avoiding collisions than in normal driving conditions, indicating a risk compensation behavior. Further, this study found that gender was associated with differential increase in collision avoidance time, with male drivers having longer collision avoidance time under manual distraction than female drivers and female drivers having longer collision avoidance time under cognitive distraction than male drivers. Overall, this study provides insights into collision avoidance behavior and aids in developing automated collision avoidance assistance systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Current research mostly studied the driving behavior of distracted drivers in abrupt situations, but different types of distraction may lead to differential crash risks, particularly during collision avoidance, which has been overlooked in the literature. As such, this study investigated and compared drivers’ collision avoidance performance under different distraction conditions. Forty-four licensed drivers completed driving simulation experiments under normal driving, cognitive distraction, and manual distraction conditions. To comprehend the collision avoidance behavior under different distraction conditions, this study analyzed hazard response time, deceleration time, and collision avoidance time—critical components in avoiding secondary collisions. For these performance measures, correlated grouped random parameters accelerated failure time models were developed, considering repeated experiment design and unobserved heterogeneity. Results indicate that drivers in manual distraction took more time to respond during the hazard response phase compared to cognitive distraction. The majority of distracted drivers were observed to spend less time decelerating and avoiding collisions than in normal driving conditions, indicating a risk compensation behavior. Further, this study found that gender was associated with differential increase in collision avoidance time, with male drivers having longer collision avoidance time under manual distraction than female drivers and female drivers having longer collision avoidance time under cognitive distraction than male drivers. Overall, this study provides insights into collision avoidance behavior and aids in developing automated collision avoidance assistance systems.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.