Sharon Hui Xuan Tan , Ishreen Kaur Dhillon , Mei Na Tan , Rahul Nair , Raymond Chung Wen Wong , Shijia Hu , Yu Fan Sim , Catherine Hsu Ling Hong
{"title":"Acceptance and Willingness-to-Pay for Teledentistry: A Contingent Valuation Study","authors":"Sharon Hui Xuan Tan , Ishreen Kaur Dhillon , Mei Na Tan , Rahul Nair , Raymond Chung Wen Wong , Shijia Hu , Yu Fan Sim , Catherine Hsu Ling Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The study sought to assess patients’ acceptance of teledentistry and their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for teledentistry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients attending a dental appointment at a public hospital in Singapore were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional study between August 2021 and March 2023. Patients’ acceptance of video consults and reviews were compared using McNemar tests. A bidding game contingent valuation method with random starting points was adopted to elicit participants’ WTP for teledentistry. Logistic regression was carried out to assess participants’ WTP equivalent in-person costs by sociodemographic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 597 respondents, the proportion willing to have an initial consult via a video call was 54.4% and 70.9% for a video review. Teledentistry acceptance was lower among older age groups and higher among those with higher education levels (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] 3.63, 95% CI = 2.16-6.15 for video reviews for university graduates). The proportion of participants willing to pay at least the quantum of in-person care for video consults and reviews was 15.2% and 79.6%, respectively. Compared to those aged 21 to 30 years, the WTP for video reviews was lower among those aged 41 years and above (OR: 0.39, 95% CI = 0.20-0.72).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Majority of patients were willing to undergo and pay at least in-person costs for video reviews compared to video consults. Younger age and higher education levels were associated with a higher willingness to accept video consults and reviews, and a higher WTP at least the equivalent in-person costs for video reviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13785,"journal":{"name":"International dental journal","volume":"75 3","pages":"Pages 1599-1607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653925000450","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
The study sought to assess patients’ acceptance of teledentistry and their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for teledentistry.
Methods
Patients attending a dental appointment at a public hospital in Singapore were recruited to participate in a cross-sectional study between August 2021 and March 2023. Patients’ acceptance of video consults and reviews were compared using McNemar tests. A bidding game contingent valuation method with random starting points was adopted to elicit participants’ WTP for teledentistry. Logistic regression was carried out to assess participants’ WTP equivalent in-person costs by sociodemographic factors.
Results
Out of 597 respondents, the proportion willing to have an initial consult via a video call was 54.4% and 70.9% for a video review. Teledentistry acceptance was lower among older age groups and higher among those with higher education levels (adjusted odds ratio [adj. OR] 3.63, 95% CI = 2.16-6.15 for video reviews for university graduates). The proportion of participants willing to pay at least the quantum of in-person care for video consults and reviews was 15.2% and 79.6%, respectively. Compared to those aged 21 to 30 years, the WTP for video reviews was lower among those aged 41 years and above (OR: 0.39, 95% CI = 0.20-0.72).
Conclusions
Majority of patients were willing to undergo and pay at least in-person costs for video reviews compared to video consults. Younger age and higher education levels were associated with a higher willingness to accept video consults and reviews, and a higher WTP at least the equivalent in-person costs for video reviews.
期刊介绍:
The International Dental Journal features peer-reviewed, scientific articles relevant to international oral health issues, as well as practical, informative articles aimed at clinicians.