Dandan Chen , Tingting Fang , Zhuo Zhang , Yan Li , Xiaoyang Liu , Haolong Hu , Ruixue Miao , Guanlin Guo
{"title":"Investigating post-remediation management strategies for contaminated sites based on residual pollutant migration risks","authors":"Dandan Chen , Tingting Fang , Zhuo Zhang , Yan Li , Xiaoyang Liu , Haolong Hu , Ruixue Miao , Guanlin Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Post-remediation management plays a crucial role in risk control for contaminated sites, ensuring environmental safety and facilitating site redevelopment. In this study, we assessed the regulatory status of 469 post-remediation sites, analyzing factors such as spatio-temporal distribution, residual pollutants, planned land use, and regulatory measures. Our findings revealed that current post-remediation management often exhibits a coexistence of insufficient and excessive regulatory oversight. To address these issues, we propose a risk classification framework aimed at refining management strategies and improving resource utilization efficiency. The classification system integrates precedence chart and fuzzy evaluation methods, categorizing the sites into three levels (Level I, II, and III), each corresponding to different treatment measures. Five typical sites were selected to validate the classification method, and the results confirmed its stability and scientific basis. The method was then applied to 104 post-remediation sites, where the classification revealed that 62.5 % of the sites were Level III, 15.4 % were Level II, and 22.1 % were Level I. Notably, the application of this method could simplify regulatory measures for 45.24 % of the sites, as some could shift to institutional control rather than requiring long-term monitoring combined with institutional control. The approach developed in this study provides a critical safeguard for the safe reuse of contaminated land, offers valuable insights for the effective development of post-remediation management, and accelerates the establishment of a post-remediation management system tailored to regional administrative conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 104153"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425001397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Post-remediation management plays a crucial role in risk control for contaminated sites, ensuring environmental safety and facilitating site redevelopment. In this study, we assessed the regulatory status of 469 post-remediation sites, analyzing factors such as spatio-temporal distribution, residual pollutants, planned land use, and regulatory measures. Our findings revealed that current post-remediation management often exhibits a coexistence of insufficient and excessive regulatory oversight. To address these issues, we propose a risk classification framework aimed at refining management strategies and improving resource utilization efficiency. The classification system integrates precedence chart and fuzzy evaluation methods, categorizing the sites into three levels (Level I, II, and III), each corresponding to different treatment measures. Five typical sites were selected to validate the classification method, and the results confirmed its stability and scientific basis. The method was then applied to 104 post-remediation sites, where the classification revealed that 62.5 % of the sites were Level III, 15.4 % were Level II, and 22.1 % were Level I. Notably, the application of this method could simplify regulatory measures for 45.24 % of the sites, as some could shift to institutional control rather than requiring long-term monitoring combined with institutional control. The approach developed in this study provides a critical safeguard for the safe reuse of contaminated land, offers valuable insights for the effective development of post-remediation management, and accelerates the establishment of a post-remediation management system tailored to regional administrative conditions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.