{"title":"New challenges at WHK LLP: A case for incorporating characteristics of private companies in classroom teaching","authors":"Kate Jelinek, Devendra Kale, Anis Triki","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper highlights the importance of incorporating key characteristics of private companies into accounting education. While many accounting graduates begin careers in public accounting, they eventually choose careers in industry, which is comprised mostly of private companies. In this paper, we call on educators to incorporate private–public company differences into classroom teaching to better prepare accounting graduates for future careers. To address this need, we provide a novel case study. Empirical results demonstrate that exposure to the case study and related classroom discussion significantly improves students’ understanding of nuances of private companies. Specifically, students demonstrate greater understanding of key differences between private and public companies, how such differences influence auditing concerns, and finally, how market forces and pressures differ between public and private companies. In sum, our case and related empirical results suggest that exposing students to key characteristics of private firms may prepare them for future careers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper highlights the importance of incorporating key characteristics of private companies into accounting education. While many accounting graduates begin careers in public accounting, they eventually choose careers in industry, which is comprised mostly of private companies. In this paper, we call on educators to incorporate private–public company differences into classroom teaching to better prepare accounting graduates for future careers. To address this need, we provide a novel case study. Empirical results demonstrate that exposure to the case study and related classroom discussion significantly improves students’ understanding of nuances of private companies. Specifically, students demonstrate greater understanding of key differences between private and public companies, how such differences influence auditing concerns, and finally, how market forces and pressures differ between public and private companies. In sum, our case and related empirical results suggest that exposing students to key characteristics of private firms may prepare them for future careers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.