{"title":"Who enrolls in accounting? Ethical predispositions of undergraduate accounting students","authors":"Tamara Poje, Mina Ličen, Maja Zaman Groff","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Business ethics has become a vital concern around the world following corporate scandals that, among other serious consequences, have affected the reputation of accountants. To rebuild ethical behavior and public trust, effective integration of ethics into accounting curricula is gaining importance. This study contributes to the efficiency of such educational efforts by examining the ethical predispositions of accounting students compared to those in other business majors. Utilizing the Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES), the study measures the impact of five moral philosophies on moral judgment. Although no differences in moral judgment were found between accounting students and students undertaking other business majors, the study reveals specific ethical predispositions of accounting students, specifically a greater influence of egoism and contractualism on their moral judgment. Additionally, the study finds that relativism significantly impacts the moral judgment of all business students, not limited to those specializing in accounting. These results are essential for accounting education, as understanding ethical predispositions can guide the tailoring of ethics education within accounting curricula. The aim of ethics education is to guide students to achieve the highest level of cognitive moral development where their moral judgment is based on own beliefs, beyond the perspective of society, culture, family, peers and self-interest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074857512500017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Business ethics has become a vital concern around the world following corporate scandals that, among other serious consequences, have affected the reputation of accountants. To rebuild ethical behavior and public trust, effective integration of ethics into accounting curricula is gaining importance. This study contributes to the efficiency of such educational efforts by examining the ethical predispositions of accounting students compared to those in other business majors. Utilizing the Multidimensional Ethics Scale (MES), the study measures the impact of five moral philosophies on moral judgment. Although no differences in moral judgment were found between accounting students and students undertaking other business majors, the study reveals specific ethical predispositions of accounting students, specifically a greater influence of egoism and contractualism on their moral judgment. Additionally, the study finds that relativism significantly impacts the moral judgment of all business students, not limited to those specializing in accounting. These results are essential for accounting education, as understanding ethical predispositions can guide the tailoring of ethics education within accounting curricula. The aim of ethics education is to guide students to achieve the highest level of cognitive moral development where their moral judgment is based on own beliefs, beyond the perspective of society, culture, family, peers and self-interest.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.