{"title":"Can online technology and resources replace accounting faculty? Student perceptions of the importance of accounting faculty","authors":"Ferdinand Siagian , Daniel Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in online technology and resources allow accounting programs to reduce faculty’s online teaching load. We investigate how students, the accounting education stakeholders most affected by the use of online technology, perceive this development. We surveyed students enrolled in online accounting courses at two AACSB-accredited universities in the US and find strong evidence that despite the advancement of online technology and resources, most students do not think that technology and online resources can replace faculty. Moreover, they do not believe that they can perform as well without faculty and thus prefer to take an online course with faculty. Their perceptions and preferences toward having an online course with faculty are positively influenced by the perceived quality of their current faculty and their GPA. Furthermore, they are negatively influenced by the perceived quality of the online technology and resources they use and their self-perceived computer ability. Additionally, we find that 25% of students who originally prefer an online course with faculty change their minds to a course without faculty when presented with a financial incentive. When presented with a flexibility incentive, 33% of students change their minds and prefer a course without faculty. Our results are consistent with the notion that most students recognize the importance of high-quality accounting faculty teaching their online courses and want them to teach their online courses. Our study is important for accounting programs interested in utilizing technology to reduce faculty teaching loads or searching for the optimal mix of faculty and technology in their accounting courses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575125000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in online technology and resources allow accounting programs to reduce faculty’s online teaching load. We investigate how students, the accounting education stakeholders most affected by the use of online technology, perceive this development. We surveyed students enrolled in online accounting courses at two AACSB-accredited universities in the US and find strong evidence that despite the advancement of online technology and resources, most students do not think that technology and online resources can replace faculty. Moreover, they do not believe that they can perform as well without faculty and thus prefer to take an online course with faculty. Their perceptions and preferences toward having an online course with faculty are positively influenced by the perceived quality of their current faculty and their GPA. Furthermore, they are negatively influenced by the perceived quality of the online technology and resources they use and their self-perceived computer ability. Additionally, we find that 25% of students who originally prefer an online course with faculty change their minds to a course without faculty when presented with a financial incentive. When presented with a flexibility incentive, 33% of students change their minds and prefer a course without faculty. Our results are consistent with the notion that most students recognize the importance of high-quality accounting faculty teaching their online courses and want them to teach their online courses. Our study is important for accounting programs interested in utilizing technology to reduce faculty teaching loads or searching for the optimal mix of faculty and technology in their accounting courses.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.