Economic growth without carbon emission: Comparative perspectives on solar, wind, hydroelectric, nuclear, and geothermal energy

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Rongrong Li , Qiang Wang , Sailan Hu
{"title":"Economic growth without carbon emission: Comparative perspectives on solar, wind, hydroelectric, nuclear, and geothermal energy","authors":"Rongrong Li ,&nbsp;Qiang Wang ,&nbsp;Sailan Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the global demand for sustainable energy intensifies, achieving economic growth without carbon emissions has become both a critical challenge and an opportunity. This study investigates the potential of five major clean energy sources—solar, wind, hydroelectric, nuclear, and geothermal energy—in fostering economic growth while reducing carbon emissions. Despite the growing interest in clean energy, the comparative effectiveness of these energy sources in different economic and environmental contexts remains underexplored, particularly concerning their nonlinear relationships with economic development and emissions. To address this gap, this study uses a robust panel dataset covering 24 countries from 2005 to 2020, and employs fixed-effect and panel threshold models to uncover the nuanced relationships between clean energy consumption, GDP, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The results indicate a positive impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth across all five energy types, with solar and wind contributing to steady development. However, the relationship with CO2 emissions varies: solar, wind, and geothermal significantly reduce emissions, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy are associated with higher emissions due to infrastructure complexities. Threshold regression analysis further identifies nonlinear effects moderated by geopolitical risk. For solar and wind energy, the carbon-reducing impact becomes more pronounced when risk levels exceed the threshold, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy show escalating emissions in high-risk environments. This study highlights solar and wind energy as the most effective solutions for achieving carbon-free economic growth, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy require improved governance and risk management frameworks to minimize their environmental trade-offs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101692"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000550","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the global demand for sustainable energy intensifies, achieving economic growth without carbon emissions has become both a critical challenge and an opportunity. This study investigates the potential of five major clean energy sources—solar, wind, hydroelectric, nuclear, and geothermal energy—in fostering economic growth while reducing carbon emissions. Despite the growing interest in clean energy, the comparative effectiveness of these energy sources in different economic and environmental contexts remains underexplored, particularly concerning their nonlinear relationships with economic development and emissions. To address this gap, this study uses a robust panel dataset covering 24 countries from 2005 to 2020, and employs fixed-effect and panel threshold models to uncover the nuanced relationships between clean energy consumption, GDP, and CO2 emissions. The results indicate a positive impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth across all five energy types, with solar and wind contributing to steady development. However, the relationship with CO2 emissions varies: solar, wind, and geothermal significantly reduce emissions, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy are associated with higher emissions due to infrastructure complexities. Threshold regression analysis further identifies nonlinear effects moderated by geopolitical risk. For solar and wind energy, the carbon-reducing impact becomes more pronounced when risk levels exceed the threshold, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy show escalating emissions in high-risk environments. This study highlights solar and wind energy as the most effective solutions for achieving carbon-free economic growth, while hydroelectric and nuclear energy require improved governance and risk management frameworks to minimize their environmental trade-offs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信